Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Suplementación de vacas doble propósito en pastoreo empleando diferentes niveles de inclusión de aceite esencial

Supplementation of dual-purpose grazing cows using different levels of essential oil inclusion



Cómo citar
Martinez Torres, V. A., Maza Angulo, L. A. ., & Garces Cardenas, J. E. . (2025). Suplementación de vacas doble propósito en pastoreo empleando diferentes niveles de inclusión de aceite esencial. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 30(1), e3578. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.3578

Dimensions
PlumX
Licencia
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Victor Alonso Martinez Torres
Libardo Alfonso Maza Angulo
Javier Enrique Garces Cardenas

Victor Alonso Martinez Torres,

Universidad de Córdoba, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Montería, Colombia


Libardo Alfonso Maza Angulo,

Universidad de Córdoba, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Montería, Colombia


Javier Enrique Garces Cardenas,

Universidad de Córdoba, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Montería, Colombia


Objetivo. Evaluar el efecto de la suplementación con diferentes niveles de inclusión de aceite esencial de canela (Cinnamomum verum) sobre el desempeño productivo y económico en pastoreo. Materiales y métodos. Fueron utilizadas 24 vacas mestizas, entre dos y tres partos con pesos promedio de 427,9 ± 43 kg. Los animales fueron distribuidos en delineamiento completamente al azar, con cuatro tratamientos y seis repeticiones. Fueron evaluadas tres fuentes de inclusión de aceite esencial (AE) en el suplemento: 1) Suplemento, 2) suplemento + 0.5 g AE/animal/día, 3) Suplemento + 1 g AE/animal/día y 4) suplemento + 1.5 g AE/animal/día. Resultados. No se encontró un efecto (P>0.05) de la adición de AE sobre la ganancia diaria de peso (GDP) y la condición corporal (CC) de los animales. No se observó efectos sobre la composición de leche (P>0.05), pero sí un comportamiento lineal creciente (P<0.05) sobre la producción promedio día y total de leche. La relación costo beneficio fue mejoró al emplear niveles de adición de 0.5 y 1 g de AE/animal/día en el suplemento, y disminuyó cuando la cantidad de aceite esencial se incrementó por encima de 1 g animal/día. Conclusiones. La adición de AE contribuyó favorablemente en la producción de leche sin afectar la ganancia de peso, condición corporal y la composición de la leche, indicando que es una alternativa viable al reducir el porcentaje del costo del suplemento e incrementar los ingresos netos a nivel de 0.5 y 1 g AE/animal/día.


Visitas del artículo 78 | Visitas PDF


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Salamanca Carreño A, Bentez Molano J, Crosby Granados R. General aspects of the dual-purpose livestock production system in the municipality of Arauca (Colombia). Villavicencio: Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry; 2021. https://doi.org/10.16925/wpri.1
  2. Arrieta-González A, Hernández-Beltrán A, Barrientos-Morales M, Martínez-Herrera DI, Cervantes-Acosta P, Rodríguez-Andrade A, Dominguez-Mancera B. Characterization and technological typification of the dual-purpose cattle system of the Huasteca Veracruzana Mexico. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2022; 27(2):e2444. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2444
  3. Gallegos-Daniel C, Taddei-Bringas C, González-Córdova AF. Overview of the dairy industry in Mexico. Social studies. Rev Aliment Contemp Desar Reg. 2023; 33(61). https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v33i61.1251
  4. Durán-Rojas E, Calderón-Rangel A, Ramírez-Montoya J. Classification of dual-purpose livestock companies by quality and marketing channels of milk in the Colombian Caribbean. Rev U.D.C.A Actual Divulg Científica. 2020; 23(2). https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v23.n2.2020.1358
  5. Martínez AG, López IE, Jiménez SE, Portillo BA, Angel GY, Amor AAR. Productive and economic evaluation of an intensive silvopastoral system for dual-purpose cattle in Michoacán, Mexico. Cienc Ergo-Sum. 2018; 25(3):8. https://doi.org/10.30878/ces.v25n3a7
  6. Suárez DH, Aranda OG. Importance of innovation to improve productivity in calf rearing systems. Advances in agricultural research. 2014; 18(3):65-74. http://ww.ucol.mx/revaia/pdf/2014/sept/5.pdf
  7. Martínez RMC, Cerrilla MEO, Haro JGH, Garza JRK, Ramos JZ, Soriano RR. Use of essential oils in farm animals. Interciencia. 2015; 40(11):744-750. https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/744-A-ORTEGA-40_117.pdf
  8. Rossi CAS, Grossi S, Dell’Anno M, Compiani R, Rossi L. Effect of a blend of essential oils, bioflavonoids and tannins on in vitro methane production and in vivo production efficiency in dairy cows. Animals. 2022; 12(6):728. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060728
  9. Silva AS, Cortinhas CS, Acedo TS, Lopes FCF, Arrigoni MB, Tomich TR, et al. Effects of essential oils supplementation, associated or not with amylase, on dry matter intake, productive performance, and nitrogen metabolism of dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2023; 297:115575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115575
  10. Jorge Alonso, Yuliana, Víctor Hugo, José Candelario. Milk production of Holstein x Gyr cows in a dual-purpose system in the tropics. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2021; 27(1):e2359. https://revistamvz.unicordoba.edu.co/article/view/e2359
  11. Maza OR, Sotelo MD, Estrada MM, Maza AL, Fonseca P. Supplementation of grazing heifers using different protein sources. Revista MVZ Córdoba. 2021; 26(2):e2027. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2027
  12. Araujo Guerra AV, Quintero Tovar AL, Quintero Gutiérrez AM, Rodríguez Polo MJ. Measuring the body condition of Zebu cattle. Doc Trab ECAPMA. 2020; 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22490/ECAPMA.3672
  13. Calderón A, Rodríguez V, Arrieta G, Martínez N, Vergara O. Physicochemical and microbiological quality of raw milk in livestock companies of the dual-purpose system in Montería (Córdoba). Rev UD.A Actual Divulg Científica. 2012; 15(2):399–407. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v15.n2.2012.841
  14. Maza A, Cardona J, Montes D. Effect of concentrate supplementation on the performance of grazing calves during the dry season in the lowland tropics. Rev Colomb Cienc Anim - RECIA. 2015; 7(2):179-184. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v7.n2.2015.264
  15. SAS. User ́s guide Statistics. Version 9.0 Cary: SAS Institute Inc., 2002.
  16. Salgado O. R, Vergara G. O, Simanca S. J. Relationships between weight, body condition and milk production in dual-purpose cows. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2008; 13(2):1360-1364. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.395
  17. Silva GG, Takiya CS, Del Valle TA, de Jesus EF, Gigoletto NT, Nakadonari B, Rennó FP. Nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and milk yield in dairy cows fed a blend of essential oils and amylase. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101(11):9815-9826. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14789
  18. Spanghero M, Robinson PH, Zanfi C, Fabbro E. Effect of increasing doses of a microencapsulated blend of essential oils on performance of lactating primiparous dairy cows. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2009; 153(1-2):153-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.004
  19. Giannenas I, Skoufos J, Giannakopoulos C, Wiemann M, Gortzi O, Lalas S, Kyriazakis I. Effects of essential oils on milk production, milk composition, and rumen microbiota in Chios dairy ewes. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94(11):5569-5577. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4096
  20. Elcoso G, Zweifel B, Bach A. Effects of a blend of essential oils on milk yield and feed efficiency of lactating dairy cows. Ciencia Animal Aplicada. 2019; 35(3):304-311. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2018-01825
  21. Silva RB, Pereira MN, Araujo RCD, Silva WDR, Pereira RAN. A blend of essential oils improved feed efficiency and affected ruminal and systemic variables of dairy cows. Transl Anim Sci. 2020; 4:182-193. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz183
  22. Silvestre T, Räisänen SE, Cueva SF, Wasson DE, Lage CFA, Martins LF, et al. Effects of a combination of Capsicum oleoresin and clove essential oil on metabolic status, lactational performance, and enteric methane emissions in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2022; 105(12):9610-9622. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22203
  23. Santana Rodriguez MO, Mestra Vargas LI, Florez Díaz H. Productive parameters of dualpurpose cattle supplemented with unconventional feed in the humid Colombian Caribbean. ALPA. 2022; 30(3):179-90. https://doi.org/10.53588/alpa.300303
  24. Benchaar C, Petit HV, Berthiaume R, Whyte TD, Chouinard PY. Effects of addition of essential oils and monensin premix on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 89(11):4352-4364. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72482-1
  25. Zhou R, Wu J, Lang X, Liu L, Casper DP, Wang C, et al. Effects of oregano essential oil on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane production, and ruminal microbial community. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103(3):2303–2314. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16611
  26. Muñoz-Cuautle A, Ortega-Cerrilla ME, Herrera-Haro JG, Nava-Cuellar C, Gutiérrez-Olvera C, Ramírez-Bribiesca JE, et al. Effect of oregano (Lippia graveolens) essential oil as a phytogenic feed additive on productive performance, ruminal fermentation, and antioxidant activity in lamb meat. Agriculture. 2022; 12(7):973. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070973
  27. Raygoza LAP, Reyes AM, García LHD. Essential oils modifying ruminal fermentation profiles and mitigating methane in ruminants. Review. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu. 2014; 5(1):25-48. https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/3216
  28. Soto DYC, Armijo JFV, Meléndez JH, González JCM, Jiménez SE, Aguirre DL. Essential oils in small ruminants and their effect on productivity. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst. 2021; 24(2):1612. https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/3468/1612
  29. González D, Quintero A. Using lactation curves as a tool for managing and improving milk production. In: González C, Madrid N, Soto E, editors. Innovation and Technology in Dual Purpose Livestock Farming. Maracaibo, Venezuela: GIRARZ Foundation. Astro Data SA Editions; 2011.
  30. Bach A, Elcoso G, Escartín M, Spengler K, Jouve A. Modulation of milking performance, methane emissions, and rumen microbiome on dairy cows by dietary supplementation of a blend of essential oils. Animal. 2023; 17(6):100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100825
  31. Braun HS, Schrapers KT, Mahlkow-Nerge K, Stumpff F, Rosendahl J. Dietary supplementation of essential oils in dairy cows: evidence for stimulatory effects on nutrient absorption. Animal. 2019; 13(3):518-523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001696
  32. Kung Jr L, Williams P, Schmidt RJ, Hu W. A Blend of Essential Plant Oils Used as an Additive to Alter Silage Fermentation or Used as a Feed Additive for Lactating Dairy Cows. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91(12):4793-4800. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1402
  33. Scharen M, Drong C, Kiri K, Riede S, Gardener M, Meyer U, Dänicke S. Differential effects of monensin and a blend of essential oils on rumen microbiota composition of transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(4):2765-2783. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11994
  34. Benchaar C, Petit HV, Berthiaume R, Ouellet DR, Chiquette J, Chouinard PY. Effects of essential oils on digestion, ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or corn silage. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90(2):886-897. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71572-2
  35. Benchaar C, McAllister TA, Chouinard PY. Digestion, ruminal fermentation, ciliate protozoal populations, and milk production from dairy cows fed cinnamaldehyde, quebracho condensed tannin, or Yucca schidigera saponin extracts. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:4765-4777. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1338
  36. Klop G, Dijkstra J, Dieho K, Hendriks WH, Bannink A. Enteric methane production in lactating dairy cows with continuous feeding of essential oils or rotational feeding of essential oils and lauric acid. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100(5):3563-3575. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12033
  37. Lejonklev J, Kidmose U, Jensen S, Petersen MA, Helwing ALF, Mortensen G, Weisbjerg M, Larsen MK. Short communication: Effect of oregano and caraway essential oils on the production and flavor of cow milk. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99(10):7898-7903. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-10910
  38. Moshidi P, Mupangwa J, Muya C. Effects of supplementation of Eucalyptus globulus essential oil on methane production, dry matter intake and milk composition in Jersey cows. Anim Sci Proc. 2021; 12(1):146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anscip.2021.03.177
  39. Tager LR, Krause KM. Effects of essential oils on rumen fermentation, milk production, and feeding behavior in lactating dairy cows. Rev Cienc Láctea. 2011; 94(5):2455-2464. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3505
  40. Yang WZ, Benchaar C, Ametaj BN, Chaves AV, He ML, McAllister TA. Effects of garlic and juniper iges essential oils on ruminal fermentation and on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90(12):5671-5681. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0369
  41. Kholif SM, Morsy TA, Abdo MM, Matloup OH, El-Ella AAA. Effect of Supplementing Lactating Goats Rations with Garlic, Cinnamon or Ginger Oils on Milk Yield, Milk Composition and Milk Fatty Acids Profile. J Life Sci. 2012; 4(1):27-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751270.2012.11885191
  42. Helander IM, Alakomi HL, Latva-Kala K, Mattila-Sandholm T, Mol I, Smid EJ, Gorris LG, von Wright A. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram-negative bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 1998; 46:3590-3595. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980154m
  43. Calderón A, García F, Martínez G. Quality indicators of raw milk in different regions of Colombia. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2006; 11(1):725-737. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.457
  44. González H, Fischer V, Rocha R, Fainé G, Stumpj W, Adeuda S. Avaliation daqualidadae do elite na bacia leitera de Pelotas, RS. Efeito dos meses do ano. Rev Bras Zootec. 2004; 33:1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000600020
  45. Rosero Alpala JA, Rangel Garcia WD, Rojas Barreto A, Orlando Burgos-Paz W. Contribution of genomic data in defining the racial composition of dual-purpose cattle. Rev Mex Cienc Pecu. 2021; 12(4):1008-1024. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i4.5690
  46. Rodríguez CE, Saavedra GF, Gómez DF. Effect of lactation stage on the physicochemical quality of milk in Holstein and Norman cows. Zootecnia Tropical. 2015; 33(1):23-35. http://www.publicaciones.inia.gob.ve/index.php/zootecniatropical/article/view/367
  47. Prendiville R, Pierce KM, Delaby L, Buckley F. Animal performance and production efficiencies of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Jersey-Holstein-Friesian cows throughout lactation. Livest Sci. 2011; 138:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.11.023
  48. Gutiérrez L FA, Rocha J, Portilla A, Ruales B. Effect of supplementation in grazing cows on production, efficiency of use and cost benefit. Siembra. 2019; 6(1):15-23. https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v6i1.1554
  49. Botero L, Rodríguez D. Cost of production of a liter of milk in a dual-purpose livestock system, Magangué, Bolívar. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2006; 11(2):806-815. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.444
  50. EspinosaGarcía J. A, MatusGardea J. A, MartínezDamián M. Á, SantiagoCruz M. D, RománPonce H, BucioAlanís L. Economic analysis of dual-purpose bovine technology in Tabasco and Veracruz. Agrociencia. 2000; 34(5):651-661. https://agrociencia-colpos.org/index.php/agrociencia/article/view/69/69

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |