Monitoring rumen environment in finishing Lidia bulls

Monitoring rumen environment in finishing Lidia bulls

Objective. The aim of this work was to characterize the changes in rumen pH and temperature in finishing Lidia breed bulls reared on pasture and fed a total mixed ration (TMR). Materials and methods. Five 4-year-old Lidia bulls received approximately 10 kg of the TMR per animal and day in the morning. Bulls could move freely in a 17-ha fenced area and express normally their feeding behaviour. Internal wireless boluses were used to collect pH and temperature values every 10 minutes throughout the measurement period. Results. Average daily pH was 6.2. Average and maximum daily temperatures were not high enough to be indicative of disease (infections of other pathologies). Conclusions. When rations and feeding systems are appropriately managed, Lidia bulls can be supplemented with concentrates in the finishing stages of their productive cycle without impairing the rumen environment.

Objetivo. El presente trabajo pretendió caracterizar las modificaciones que se producen en el pH y la temperatura ruminal de los toros de lidia, criados con un sistema de alimentación basado en el suministro de una mezcla unifeed seca durante la etapa de acabado. Materiales y métodos. Se utilizaron 5 toros cuatreños de la raza de Lidia alimentados con, aproximadamente, 10 kg/animal y día de la mezcla unifeed a primera hora de la mañana. Los toros disponían de un espacio cercado de 17 ha, que les permitiría expresar sus patrones de comportamiento de pastoreo en libertad con plena normalidad. El pH y la temperatura ruminal se midió de forma continua utilizando una sonda interna sin cables. Resultados. El pH medio fue de 6.20. Ni los valores de temperatura ruminal medios ni los máximos registrados son excesivamente altos como para ser indicativos del desarrollo de patologías o infecciones que pudieran afectar al estado de los animales. Conclusiones. Mediante el manejo adecuado de las raciones y del sistema de alimentación, puede llevarse a cabo una suplementación con alimentos concentrados para toros de lidia en la fase de remate de manera adecuada y respetuosa con su ambiente ruminal.

1. Bartolomé DJ. Influencia de la acidosis ruminal en el síndrome de caída y la respuesta etolágica del toro de lidia en la plaza [Tesis Doctoral]. Leán (Spain): Universidad de Leán; 2009.
3. Jordán D, Villa NA, Gutiérrez M, Gallego ÁB, Ochoa GA, Ceballos A. Blood chemistry in bullfighting cattle maintained under grazing conditions in Andes Mountains from Colombia. Rev Colomb Ciencias Pecu 2006; 19(1):18−26.
5. Lomillos Pérez JM, Alonso de la Varga M, Gaudioso Lacasa V. Análisis de la evolucián del manejo en las explotaciones de toro de lidia: desafíos del sector. ITEA-Informacián Técnica Econámica Agraria 2013; 109:49-68.
7. Crater AR, Barboza PS, Forster RJ. Regulation of rumen fermentation during seasonal fluctuations in food intake of muskoxen. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol 2007; 146(2):233−241.
8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.019
10. Nagaraja TG, Titgemeyer EC. Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90(Suppl 1):E17−E38.
11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-478
13. Plaizier JC, Krause DO, Gozho GN, McBride BW. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J 2008; 176(1):21−31.
14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.016
16. Directiva 2010/63/UE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 22 de septiembre de 2010 relativa a la proteccián de los animales utilizados para fines científicos. Diario Oficial de la Unián Europea, 20 de octubre de 2010; L276: 33−79.
18. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 19th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Association of Analitycal Chemists; 2012.
20. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74(10):3583−3597.
21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
23. Dye TK, Richards CJ. Effect of water consumption on rumen temperature. J Anim Sci. 2008; 86 (Suppl 3): 114.
25. Bodas R, Posado R, Bartolomé DJ, Tabernero de Paz MJ, Herráiz P, Rebollo E, et al. Ruminal pH and temperature, papilla characteristics, and animal performance of fattening calves fed concentrate or maize silage-based diets. Chil J Agric Res 2014; 74(3):280−285.
26. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392014000300005
28. Moya D, Mazzenga A, Holtshausen L, Cozzi G, González LA, Calsamiglia S, et al. Feeding behavior and ruminal acidosis in beef cattle offered a total mixed ration or dietary components separately. J Anim Sci 2011; 89(2):520−530.
29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3045
31. Calsamiglia S, Cardozo PW, Ferret A, Bach A. Changes in rumen microbial fermentation are due to a combined effect of type of diet and pH. J Anim Sci 2007; 86(3):702−711.
32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0146
34. González LA, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Ferret A. Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review). Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012; 172(1-2):66−79.
35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009
37. Crater AR, Barboza PS. The Rumen in Winter: Cold Shocks in Naturally Feeding Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). J Mammal 2007; 8(3):625−631.
38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-170R1.1
40. Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA, Gibb DJ, Streeter M, Kennedy AD. Effect of feed delivery fluctuations and feeding time on ruminal acidosis, growth performance, and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2004; 82(11):3357−3365.
41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113357x
43. González LA, Ferret A, Manteca X, Ruíz-de-la-Torre JL, Calsamiglia S, Devant M, et al. Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place. J Anim Sci 2008; 86(6):1446−1458.
44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0675
46. Brown MS, Ponce CH, Pulikanti R. Adaptation of beef cattle to high-concentrate diets: Performance and ruminal metabolism. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(13 Suppl):E25−E33.
47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2006.8413_supplE25x
49. Penner GB, Taniguchi M, Guan LL, Beauchemin KA, Oba M. Effect of dietary forage to concentrate ratio on volatile fatty acid absorption and the expression of genes related to volatile fatty acid absorption and metabolism in ruminal tissue. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92 (6): 2767−2781.
50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1716
52. AlZahal O, Kebreab E, France J, Froetschel M, McBride BW. Ruminal temperature may aid in the detection of subacute ruminal acidosis. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91(1):202−207.
53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0535
55. AlZahal O, Rustomo B, Odongo NE, Duffield TF, McBride BW. Technical note: A system for continuous recording of ruminal pH in cattle. J Anim Sci 2007; 85(1):213−217.
56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-095
58. AlZahal O, Steele MA, Valdes EV, McBride BW. Technical note: The use of a telemetric system to continuously monitor ruminal temperature and to predict ruminal pH in cattle. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92(11):5697−5701.
59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2220
61. Wright CL. Management of water quality for beef cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2007; 23(1):91−103.
62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2006.12.002
64. Wahrmund JL, Ronchesel JR, Krehbiel CR, Goad CL, Trost SM, Richards CJ. Ruminal acidosis challenge impact on ruminal temperature in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2012; 90(8):2794−2801.
65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4407