Conservation and chemical composition of Leucaena Leucocephala plus fresh or wilted Pennisetum purpureum mixed silages

Conservation and chemical composition of Leucaena Leucocephala plus fresh or wilted Pennisetum purpureum mixed silages

ABSTRACT

Objective. Quantify the effects of mixing Leucaena (L) with King grass forage, fresh (K) or wilted (Kp), on the fermentation process and chemical composition of mixed silages. Materials and methods. Silos were produced mixing several proportions (kg:kg) K:L and Kp:L (100:0; 75:25; 60:40; 50:50; 40:60 and 0:100) of both types of plants, under a completely randomized design of four replications. The quantity of organic acids (butyric, acetic, lactic), pH, ammonia nitrogen percent and some of the typical bromatologic nutrients of the forage before and after ensiling were measured. The treatment effects were evaluated through variance and regression analysis. Results. The results clearly proved the differences (p<0.05) between King grass and Leucaena which promote its mixing and wilting: better legume contents of crude protein (24 vs. 7%), dry matter (33.77 vs. 22.05%) and crude fiber (26.53 vs. 32.5%). Clear benefits on the conservation process of mixed silages were also measured: higher lactic productions and less butyric, acceptable pH (4.02-4.8) and protein degradation (<8%). In addition, a positive effect on the chemical composition of the aforementioned silages was quantified (crude protein, dry matter and crude fiber progressive improvement). Conclusions. Mixed K+L silages are better than pure K if L is included below 25% in KL and up to 40% when K has been wilted. Higher inclusions of L will worsen the conservation process and will limit its elaboration.

1. Cárdenas JV, Sandoval CA, Solorio FJ. Composición química de ensilajes mixtos de gramíneas y especies arbóreas de Yucatán, México. Téc Pecu Méx 2003; 41(3): 283-294.
3. Tjandraatmadja M, MacRae IC, Norton BW. Effect of the inclusion of tropical legumes, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala, on the nutritive value of silages prepared from tropical grasses. J Agric Sci Cambr 1993; 120(3):397-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600076565
5. Santana AA. Mejoramiento del valor nutritivo de los ensilajes tropicales mediante mezclas de gramíneas y leguminosas. [Tesis doctorado] Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria; Universidad de Granma. Granma, Cuba 2000.
7. Dewhurst RJ, Fisher WJ, Tweed JKS, Wilkins RJ. Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 1. Production responses with different levels of concentrates. J. Dairy Sci 2003; 86(8):2612–2621. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73856-9
9. Merry RJ, Lee MRF, Davies DR, Dewhurst RJ, Moorby JM, Scollan ND, Theodorou MK. Effects of high-sugar ryegrass silage and mixtures with red clover silage on ruminant digestion. 1. In vitro and in vivo studies of nitrogen utilization. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(11):3049–3060. URL Disponible en: http://www.journalofanimalscience.org/content/84/11/3049
11. Santana AA, Pérez A, Figueredo ME. Efectos del estado de madurez en el valor nutritivo y momento óptimo de corte del forraje napier (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) en época lluviosa. Rev Mex Téc Pecu 2010; 1(3):277-286.
13. Herrera RS, González SB, Hardy C, Pedroso D. Análisis químico del pasto. Metodologías para las tablas de su composición. La Habana. Cuba: Edit. ENPES; 1980.
15. StatSoft, Inc. STATISTICA. Software de análisis de datos. Version 8.0. Tulsa, Oklahoma. USA. 2007.
17. Ojeda F, Montejo IL, López O. Estudio de la calidad fermentativa de la morera y la hierba de guinea ensilada en diferentes proporciones. Pastos y Forrajes 2006. 29(2):195-202.
19. Alpízar A, Camacho MI, Sáenz C, Campos ME, Arece J. Esperance M. Efecto de la inclusión de diferentes niveles de morera (Morus alba) en la calidad nutricional de ensilajes de sorgo (Sorghum almum). Pastos y Forrajes 2014. 37(1): 47-52.
21. Tessema Z, Baar RMT. Chemical composition, dry matter production and yield dynamics of tropical grasses mixed with perennial forage legumes. Tropical Grasslands 2006; 40:150-156.
23. Baba M, Halim RA, Alimon AR, Idris AB, Juraimi AS. Grass-legume mixtures: An analysis of dry matter yield, chemical composition, and in vitro apparent dry matter digestibility. J Food Agr Envirom 2013; 11(3-4): 995-1001.
25. Kechero Y. Effects of seed proportions of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) and white sweet clover (Melilotus alba) at sowing on agronomic characteristics and nutritional quality. Livestock Res for Rural Dev 2008; 20(2)20-28. URL Disponible en http//www.Irrd.org/Irrd20/2/yise20028.htm
27. Sanderson MA. Nutritive value and herbage accumulation rates of pastures sown to grass, legume and chicory mixtures. Agron J 2010; 102(2): 728-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0374
29. Pihiri MS, Ngongoni NT, Maasdorp BV, Titterton M, Mupangwa JF, Sebata A. Ensiling characteristics and feeding value of silage made from browse tree legume-maize mixtures. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 2007; 7(3):149-156.
31. Moran J. Making quality silage. Tropical dairy farming: feeding management for smallholder dairy farmers in the humid tropics. Landlinks Press. 2005; 83-95.
33. Lambertucci DM, Pinho MRO, Gomes FA, Fernandes EC, Mistura C, Martins COM, Silva AS. Produção de silagem de capim elefante cv. Napier utilizando farinha de mandioca. Rev Sodebras 2013; 8: 74-77.
35. Eriksson T, Norell L. Nilsdotter-Linde N. Nitrogen metabolism and milk production in dairy cows fed semi-restricted amounts of ryegrass–legume silage with birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) or white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Grass Forage Sci 2012; 67(4): 546-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00882.x
37. Keles G, Demirci U. The effect of homofermentative and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on conservation characteristics of baled triticale–Hungarian vetch silage and lamb performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011; 164(1-2): 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.017
39. Muhammad LR, Baba M, Mustapha A, Ahmad MY, Abdurrahman LS. Use of legumes in the improvement of silage quality of Columbus grass (Sorghum almum Parodi). Res J Anim Sci 2008; 2(4):109-112.
41. Herrera JM, Isaac ML, Rodríguez R, Zamora JF, Ruíz MA, García PM. Conservación del forraje de Lupinus rotundiflorus M. E. Jones y Lupinus exaltatus Zucc. mediante ensilaje. Revista INTERCIENCIA 2010; 35(8):592-599.
43. Jatkauskas J, Vrotniakienė V, Urbšienė D. Effects of a bacterial mix inoculant on grass-legume silage fermentation and nutrition value for the dairy cows. Animal Husbandry 2008; 52: 51–59.
45. Tao L, Yu Z, Guo XS, Zhou H. Ensiling and in vitro digestibility characteristics of Ceratoides arborescens treated with lactic acid bacteria inoculants and cellulase. Afr J Biotechnol 2011; 10(66): 14947-14953. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.889
47. Bickel A, Friedel K, Gabel M. Factors potentially affecting proteolysis under in vitro conditions using Rostocker fermentationstest: first results. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol 2006; 15: 56-67.
49. Montejo IL, Lamela L, Sánchez T, López O. Nota técnica: Producción de leche con ensilaje de hollejo de cítrico. Pastos y Forrajes 2008; 31(2): 179-186.
51. Jaakkola S, Kaunisto V, Huhtanen P. Volatile fatty acid proportions and microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage ensiled with different rates of formic acid. Grass and Forrage Sci 2006; 61:282-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2006.00532.x
53. Vanhatalo A, Gäddäs T. Microbial protein synthesis, digestion and lactation responses of cows to grass or grass-red clover silage diet supplemented with barley or oats. Agric and Food Sci 2006; 15:252-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.2137/145960606779216236
55. El-Emam GI, Hafez YH, Behery HR, Khalifa EI, Shehata EI, Ahmed ME. Growth performance, some rumen and blood parameters of growing rahmani lambs fed rations containing triticale or berseem silages and their mixture. Egyptian J Sheep & Goat Sci 2014; 9(1):67-76.