Palatability and digestibility of horse diets containing increasing levels of citrus pulp

Palatability and digestibility of horse diets containing increasing levels of citrus pulp

ABSTRACT

Objective. To evaluate the impact of citrus pulp on the palatability and digestibility of horse diets and the physicochemical characteristics of the feces. Materials and methods. The diets were composed of 60% of the energy from the forage and 40% from the concentrate, with increasing levels of citrus pulp. Two different tests were performed. The first test assessed the palatability of concentrates. Using a randomized experimental design, 15 horses were observed for 10 days. The variables recorded were first action, first choice and intake ratio (IR). Five horses were arranged in 5x5 Latin Square design for the test assessing digestibility and fecal physicochemical characteristics. The apparent digestibility of the nutrients and the color, consistency, pH and buffering capacity (BC) of the feces were evaluated. Results. The addition of increasing levels of citrus pulp had an effect (p≤0.001) on first action. A difference was also observed in first choice, and the addition of 0, 7 or 14% of citrus pulp was preferred. A difference between treatments (p≤0.001) was also observed for IR, and the control concentrate was consumed the most. The amount of citrus pulp included had no effect (p>0.05) on the digestibility of nutrients, fecal consistency and color, and there was no effect (p>0.05) on fecal pH and BC. Conclusions. Horses can identify the presence of citrus pulp in concentrates but prefer concentrates without added citrus pulp. Citrus pulp does not negatively affect the digestibility of concentrates or the physicochemical characteristics of the feces; thus, citrus pulp is a viable alternative ingredient in the formulation of horse diets.

RESUMEN

Objetivo. Evaluar la inclusión de pulpa de cítricos en la dieta de los caballos a través de la evaluación de la de palatabilidad, digestibilidad y características fisicoquímicas de las heces. Materiales y métodos. El valor energético de las dietas fue aportado en el 60% por la energía del forraje y en el 40% a partir del concentrado con niveles crecientes de pulpa de cítricos. En la primera prueba se evaluó la palatabilidad de los concentrados. Se utilizó un diseño experimental aleatório. Se observaron 15 caballos durante 10 días. Las variables registradas fueron la primera acción, la primera opción y la relación de la ingesta (IR). Cinco caballos fueron dispuestos en un diseño cuadrado latino 5x5 para la evaluación de la digestibilidad y las características fisicoquímicas fecales. La digestibilidad de los nutrientes y el color, la consistencia, el pH, y se evaluó la capacidad de tamponamiento (CT) de las heces. Resultados. El nível de inclusión de pulpa de cítricos tuvo un efecto (p<0.001) en la primera acción. Una diferencia también se observó en primera elección. Una diferencia (p<0.001) entre los tratamientos también se observó para IR. El nível de inclusión de pulpa de cítricos no efectó (p>0.05) la digestibilidad, consistencia fecal y el color de las heces, pH fecal y CT de las heces. Conclusiones. Los caballos pueden identificar la presencia de pulpa de cítricos en los concentrados, pero prefieren concentrados sin pulpa de cítricos. La pulpa de cítricos no afecta la digestibilidad de los nutrimentos en el concentrado, ni las características fisicoquímicas de las heces; la pulpa de cítricos es un ingrediente alternativo viable en la formulación de dietas para caballos.

1. Brandi RA, Furtado CA. Nutritional and metabolic importance of fiber in the horse diet. Rev Bras Zootec 2009; 38:246-258.
2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300025
4. Oliveira GJC, Lima JAF, Araújo KV, Fialho ET, Bertechini AG, Pérez JRO, Freitas RTF. Effect of Pectin and Soybean Meal Addition on the Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients, in Horses. Rev Bras Zootec 2002; 31(3):1184-1192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982002000500015
6. Furtado CE, Brandi RA, Ribeiro LB. Utilização de coprodutos e demais alimentos alternativos para dietas de equinos. Rev Bras Zootec 2011.; 40:214-223.
8. Ott EA, Feaster JP, Lieb S. Acceptability and digestibility of dried citrus pulp by horses. J Anim Sci Champaign 1979; 49(4):983-987. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.494983x
10. Manzano A, Freitas AR, Esteves SN, Novaes NJ. Pelleted Citrus Pulp in Equine Feeding. Rev Bras Zootec 1999; 29(6):1327-1332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35981999000600021
12. Miraglia N, Bergero D, Polidori M, Peiretti PG, Ladetto G. The effects of a new fibre-rich concentrate on the digestibility of horse rations. Livest Sci 2006; 100:10–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.003
14. Peiretti PG, Meineri G, Miraglia N, Mucciarelli M, Bergero D. Intake and apparent digestibility of hay or hay plus concentrate diets determined in horses by the total collection of feces and n-alkanes as internal markers. Livest Sc 2006; 100:189–194.
15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.08.016
17. Richards N, Hinch GN, Rowe JB. The effect of current grain feeding practices on hindgut starch fermentation and acidosis in the Australian racing Thoroughbred. Aust Vet J 2006; 84(11): 402-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2006.00059.x
19. Godoi FN, Almeida FQ, Guarienti GA, Santiago JM, Guedes Júnios D, Nogueira YC, Brasileiro LS. Blood profile and characteristics of the feces of horses fed with high fat diets. Cien Rural 2009; 39(9):2571-2577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009000900029
21. Berg EL, Fu CF, Potter JH, Kerley MS. Fructooligosaccharide supplementation in the yearling horse: effects on fecal pH, microbial content, and volatile fatty acid concentrations. J Anim Sci 2005; 83(7):1549-1553. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2005.8371549x
23. Zeyner A, Geibler C, Dittrich A. Effects of hay intake and feeding sequence on variables in faeces and faecal water (dry matter, pH value, organic acids, ammonia, buffering capacity) of horses. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2004; 88(1):7-19.
24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00447.x
26. Moreira CM. Palatabilidade e digestibilidade aparente de dietas com níveis crescentes de inclusão de polpa cítrica para equinos [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Pirassununga. Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, São Paulo, Brasil. 2014.
28. Statistical Analysis System - SAS. SAS OnlineDoc. Version 9.1.3. Cary: SAS Institute, 2004.
30. NRC. Nutrients requirements of domestic horses. 6.ed. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science 2007; 341.
32. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 19. ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, Arlington, VA. 2012.
34. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JP, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74: 3583-3597.
35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
37. Cairns MC, Cooper JJ, Davidson HPB, Mills DS. Association in horses of orosensory characteristics of foods with their post-ingestive consequences. Animal Science 2002; 75: 257-265.
39. Tribucci AMO, Brandi RA, Balieiro JCC, Titto EAL, Bueno ICS. Palatability of horse diets containing citrus pulp (Citrus sinensis) through the preference test. Ital J Anim Sci 2013; 12(33):204-207.
41. Assis AJ, Campos JMS, Filho SCV, Queiroz AC, Lana RP, Euclydes RF, Neto JM, Magalhães ALR, Mendonça SS. Citrus pulp in diets for milking cows. 1. Intake of nutrients, milk production and composition. Rev. Bras. Zootec 2004; 33(1):242-250.
42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000100028
44. Müller CE, Udén P. Preference of horses for grass conserved as hay, haylage or silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007; 132:66-78.
45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.02.013
47. Weynberg SV, Sales J, Janssens GPJ. Passage rate of digesta through the equine gastrointestinal tract: A review. Livest Sci 2006; 99:3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.04.008
49. Gonçalves S, Leblond A, Drogoul C, Julliand V. Using feces characteristics as a criterion for the diagnosis of colic in the horse: a clinical review of 207 cases. Revue de Méd Vét 2006; 1(157) 3-10.
51. Filgueiras JM, Melo UP, Ferreira C, França AS, Shimoda E. Feces characteristics and faecal sand excretion in equine keep at pasture in Cachoeiro Itapemirim city, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Cienc Anim Bras 2009; 10(4):1200-1206.
53. Brokner C, Austbo D, Naesset JA, Knudsen KEB, Tauson AT. Equine pre-caecal and total tract digestibility of individual carbohydrate fractions and their effect on caecal pH response. Arch Anim Nutr 2012; 66(6):490-506.
54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2012.740311
56. Hoffman RM. Carbohydrate metabolism and metabolic disorders in horses. Rev Bras Zootec 2009; 38:270-276.
57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300027