Effect of age and coasting period on oocytes quality and their in vitro development from prepubertal cattle

Efecto de la edad y la hora de la aspiración sobre la calidad oocitaria y el desarrollo in vitro en hembras bovinas prepúberes

Published 2011-05-10

Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
How to Cite
Bernal U, S., Gonella D, Ángela, Valbuena, D., Mendoza, R., Molina, J., & Chacón J, L. (2011). Effect of age and coasting period on oocytes quality and their in vitro development from prepubertal cattle. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 16(2), 2499-2506. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1012
doi

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1012
Dimensions
PlumX
Sandra Bernal U
Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales UDCA, Facultad Ciencias Agrarias.
Ángela Gonella D
Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales UDCA, Facultad Ciencias Agrarias.
Diego Valbuena
Central de procesamiento de semen y núcleo de mejoramiento Genético “Las Camelias”.
Rubén Mendoza
Central de procesamiento de semen y núcleo de mejoramiento Genético “Las Camelias”.
Juan Molina
Intervet International B.V.
Liliana Chacón J
Universidad de La Salle, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria.
Show authors biography
Objective. This study evaluated the effect of age and coasting period over oocyte quality and their posterior development under in vitro conditions from prepubertal Bos indicus crossbred donors. Material and methods. Donors females received a norgestomet implant and estradiol benzoate. Four days later a unique dosage of 150 IU of eCG was administered. Three coasting periods (24, 48, and 56 h) and four ages (3, 6, 10, and 12 months) were proved. All antral follicles were aspirated and an in vitro culture proceed was done. Results. 439 follicles were aspirated, of which 385 (87.7%) were 2-5 mm, 41 (9.33%) were 5-10 mm, and 13 (2.3%) were ›10 mm. After aspiration, a total of 373 oocytes (84.9%) were recovered, finding differences (p<0.05) between averages of 6 (9.3) and 10 months old animals (32.3). 285 (76.4 %) recovered oocytes were subjected to in vitro process. Cleavage values were significantly higher (p<0.05) in 10 (27.1%) and 12 months animals (26.8%). Although the number of transferable embryos was low, there were differences between ages (p<0.05) obtaining a higher percentage in age 3 (12.6%). Conclusions. A coasting period higher than 24 h has a negative effect on oocyte quality. Some oocytes from 3 months old calves were competent for in vitro embryo development; however, higher numbers of embryos were produced from 10 and 12 months of age prepuber females, indicating they have higher competency in vitro.

Article visits 930 | PDF visits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Chohan KR, Hunter AG. In vitro maturation, fertilization and early cleavage rates of bovine fetal oocytes. Theriogenology 2004; 61:373-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00220-6
  3. Kelly JM, Kleemann DO, Walker SK. A comparision of the in vitrodevelopment of cow and calf oocites. Theriogenology 2003; 59:449(Abstract).
  5. Galli C, Duchi R, Crotti G, Turini P, Ponderato N, Colleoni S, Lagutina I, Lazzari G. Bovine embryo technologies. Theriogenology 2003; 59(2):599-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01243-8
  7. Mapletoft RJ, Hasler JF. Assisted reproductive technologies in cattle: a review. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 2005; 24(1):393-403. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.24.1.1582
  9. Morton KM. Developmental capabilities of embryos produced in vitro from prepubertal lamb oocytes. Reprod Domest Anim 2008; 43(Suppl 2):137-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01153.x
  11. Camargo LSA, Viana JHM, Sá WF, Ferreira AM, Vale Filho VR. Developmental competence of ooctytes from prepubertal Bos indicus crossbred cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 2005; 85: 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.04.020
  13. Fisher AE, Bernal DP, Gutierrez-Robayo C, Rutledge JJ. Estimates of heterosis for in vitro embryo production using reciprocal crosses in cattle. Theriogenology 2000; 54:1433-1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00465-9
  15. Camargo LSA, Viana JHM, Sá WF, Ferreira AM, Ramos AA, Freitas C, Vale Filho VR. Developmental competence of oocytes obtained from Bos taurus and Bos indicus dairy cows raised in tropical climate. Reprod Fert Dev 2006; 18:243-244. https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv18n2Ab272
  17. Kauffold J, Amer HAH, Bergfeld U, Weber W; Sobiraj A. The In Vitro Developmental Competence of Oocytes from Juvenile Calves is Related to Follicular Diameter. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51(3):325-332. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.17002
  19. Ptak G, Matsukawa K, Palmieri C, Della Salda L, Scapolo PA, Loi P. Developmental and functional evidence of nuclear immaturity in prepubertal oocytes. Hum Reprod 2006; 21(9):2228-2237. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del184
  21. Majerus V, Lequarré AS, Ferguson EM, Kaidi S, Massip A, Dessy F, Donnay I. Characterization of embryos derived from calf oocytes: kinetics of cleavage, cell allocation to inner cell mass, and trophoectoderm and lipid metabolism. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 57:346-352.2505
  23. Bols PEJ, Leroy JLMR, Viana JHM. Technical and biological aspects of ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval in the cow: an overview. Acta Sci Vet 2005; 33(supl1): 103-118.
  25. Petyim S, Bage R, Hallap T, Bergqvist AS, Rodriguez-Martinez H, Larsson B. Two different Schemes of twaice wakly ovum pick-up in dairy heifers: effect on oocite recovery and ovarian function. Theriogenology 2003; 60: 175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01363-8
  27. Merton JS, de Roos APW, Mullaart E, de Ruigh L, Kaal L, Vos PLAM, Dieleman SJ. Factors affecting oocite quality and quantity in comercial application of embryo technologyes in cattle breeding industry. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 651-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01246-3
  29. Taneja M, Bols PEJ, Van de Velde A, Ju JC, Shreiber D, Tripp MW, Levin H, Echelard Y, Yan X. Developmental competence of juvenile calf oocytes in vitro and in vivo: influence of donor animal variation and repeated gonadotropin stimulation. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:206-213. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.1.206
  31. Presicce GA, Senatore EM, De Santis G, Stecco R, Terzano GM, Borghese A, De Mauro GJ. Hormonal stimulation and oocyte maturational competence in prepuberal Mediterranean Italian buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology 2002; 57 (7):1877-1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00677-5
  33. Ptak G, Tischner M, Bernabo N, Loi P. Donor-Dependent Developmental Competence of Oocytes from Lambs Subjected to Repeated Hormonal Stimulation. Biol Reprod 2003; 69(1):278-285 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.011312
  35. Techakumphu M, Promdireg A, Na-Chiengmai A, Phutikanit N. Repeated oocyte pick up in prepubertal swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves after FSH superstimulation. Theriogenology 2004; 61(9):1705-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.09.016
  37. Chaubal SA, Molina JA, Ohlrichs CL, Ferre LB, Faber DC, Bols PEJ, Riesen JW, Tian X, Yang X. Comparison of different transvaginal ovum pick-up protocols to optimise oocyte retrieval and embryo production over a 10-week period in cows. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 1631-1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.07.020
  39. Goodhand KL, Staines ME, Hutchinson JSM, Broadbent PJ. In vivo oocyte recovery and in vitro embryo production from bovine oocyte donors treated with progestagen, oestradiol and FSH. Anim Reprod Sci 2000; 63: 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00186-X
  41. Blondin P, Bousquet D, Twuagiramungu H, Barnes F, Sirard MA. Manipulation of follicular development to produce developmentally competent Bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:38-43. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.38
  43. Dieleman SJ, Hendriksen PJM, Viuf D, Thomsen PD, Hyttel P, Knijn HM, Wrenzyck C, Kruip TAM, Niemann H, Gadella BM, Bevers MM, Vos PLAM. Effects of in vivo prematuration and in vivo final maturation on developmental capacity and quality of pre-implantation embryos. Theriogenology 2002; 57: 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00655-0
  45. Choi YH, Carnevale EM, Seidel GE Jr, Squire EL. Effects of gonadotropins on bovine oocytes matured in TCM-199. Theriogenology 2001; 56(4):661-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00597-0
  47. Camargo LS, Freitas C, de Sa WF, de Moraes Ferreira A, Serapiao RV, Viana JH. Gestation length, birth weight and offspring gender ratio of in vitro-produced Gyr (Bos indicus) cattle embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 2010; 120(1-4):10-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.02.013
  49. Seneda MM, Esper CR, Andrade ER, Binelli M, Max MC, Oliveira JA, Garcia JM. Relationship between follicle size after FSH treatment and efficiency of oocytes recovery. Anim Reprod 2005; 2:78-182.
  51. Snel-Oliveira MN, Costa PD, Malagoni JD, Rumpf R. Estimulação Hormonal, Punção Folicular Transvaginal e Avaliação Ovocitária em bezerras Pré-Púberes da raça Nelore (Bos taurus indicus). R Bras Zootec 2003; 32: 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982003000100014
  53. Molina JR, Benoit AM, Lkhagvadorj S, Anderson LL. Hypothalamic differentiation in prepuberal beef heifers: Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol benzoate on luteinizing hormone secretion. Livest Sci 2009; 120(1):13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.04.019
  55. Oropeza A, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Hadeler KG, Niemann H. Improvement of the Developmental Capacity of Oocytes from Prepubertal Cattle by Intraovarian Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Application. Biol Reprod 2004; 70(6):1634-1643. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.025494
  57. Salamone DF, Damiani P, Fissore RA, Robl JM, Duby RT. Biochemical and developmental evidence the ooplasmic maturation of prepubertal bovine oocytes is compromise. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1761-1768. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1761
  59. Mapletoft RJ, Steward KB. Adams GP. Recent advances in the superovulation in cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002; 42(6):601-611. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2002046
  61. Peterson AJ, Lee RS. Improving successful pregnancies after embryo transfer. Theriogenology 2003; 59(2):687-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01248-7

Information

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

0.6
2020CiteScore
 
 
28th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Redib Widget
Tutorials

Autors:

How send article?

Evaluator pair

How to evaluate an article?

Keywords

QR code

Current Issue

Perfil de Google Scholar

Most read in the last 30 days

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |