Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Comet assay to determine genetic damage by the use of ivermectin in zebu cows (Bos taurus indicus)

Determinación mediante prueba cometa del daño genético causado por uso de ivermectina en vacas cebú (Bos taurus indicus)



Open | Download

How to Cite
Montes-Vergara, D., De la Ossa V, J., & Pérez- Cordero, A. (2017). Comet assay to determine genetic damage by the use of ivermectin in zebu cows (Bos taurus indicus). Journal MVZ Cordoba, 22(2), 5959-5965. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1034

Dimensions
PlumX
Donicer Montes-Vergara
Jaime De la Ossa V
Alexander Pérez- Cordero

Objective. The objective of the work was evaluate the damage genetic caused by the use of ivermectin (IVM) in cows zebu to concentrations of 1% and 3.15% through the test comet. Material and methods. 15 cows, were taken with age between 3 and 4 years old, average weight of 350 kg, body condition between 3 and 3.5. Three experimental groups with five animals per group, which were exposed to the concentration of IVM to 1% to 3.15% more group control (without application of IVM) were used. Animal blood sample was performed by venipuncture jugular or medial flow with vacutainer® needle, extracting 8 ml of blood. The blood samples it was collected at 9, 18 and 27 days post-treatment. Results. The display of the comets is made by using fluorescence microscope, the cells were evaluated by means of visual log and the Comet image software. Evidenced the presence of nuclei with DNA migration in all analyzed plates. The values of classification of comets indicate cells with high levels of damage (grade 3: cells with high damage). The rate of DNA damage of the treatment to 1% to 3.15% was significant, to relate to the control group. Conclusions. The results obtained in this study demonstrate the likely genotoxic potential of the use of IVM in cattle.


Article visits 1604 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Sturchio J, The case of ivermectin: lessons and implications for improving accesto care and treatment in developing countries. Comm. Eye Health 2001; 14(38):22-23.
  2. Rodríguez M, Katholi CR, Hassan HK, Unnasch TR. Large-scale entomologic assessment of Onchocerca volvulus transmission by poolscreen PCR in México. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006; 74(2):1026-1033.
  3. Lifschitz A, VirkeL G, Ballent M, Sallovitz J, Imperiale F, Pis A, et al. Ivermectin (3.15%) long-acting formulations in cattle: absorption pattern and pharmacokinetic considerations. Vet Parasitol 2007; 147(1):303-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.04.009
  4. Intapan PM, Prasongdee TK, Laummaunwai P, Sawanyawisuth K, Singthong S, Maleewong W. Amodified filter paper culture technique for screening of Strongyloides stercoralis ivermectin sensitivity in clinical specimens. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006; 75:763-564.
  5. Kane NS, Hirschberg B, Qian S, Hunt D, Thomas B, Brochu R, et al. Drug- resistant Drosophila indicate glutamate-gated chloride chanels are targets for the antiparasitics nodulosporic and ivermectin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000; 97:13949-13954. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240464697
  6. Fiel CA, Samuell CA, Steffan PE, Rodríguez EM. Resistance of cooperia to ivermectin treatments in grazing cattle of the humid pampa, Argentina. Vet Parasitol 2001; 97:211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00407-1
  7. Singh NP, Mccoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of ADN damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988; 175:184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(88)90265-0
  8. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, AUT; 2015.
  9. Ramírez V, Cuenca P. DNA damage in female workers exposed to pesticides in banana plantations at Limon, Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 1998; 50:507-518.
  10. Ejchart A, Sadlej-Sosnowska N. Statistical evaluation and comparison of comet assay results. Mutat Res 2003; 534:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(02)00250-4
  11. Uhl M, Helma C, Knasmüller S. Single cell gel electrophoresis assays with human-derived hepatoma (HepG2) Mutat Res 1999; 441:215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00050-9
  12. Brink A, Schulz B, Kobras K, Lutz WK, Stoppe H. Time-dependent effects of sodium arsenite on DNA breakage and apoptosis observed in the comet assay. Mutat Res 2006; 603:121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.10.015
  13. Ortiz IC, Pelaez CA, Orozco LY, Zuleta M. Interacciones genotóxicas de mutágenos en mezclas binarias mediante ensayo cometa alcalino en linfocitos humanos. Biomed 2012; 32:437-448. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v32i3.739
  14. Gyori BM, Venkatachalam G, Thiagarajan PS, Hsu D, Clement MV. Open Comet: an automated tool for comet assay image analysis. Redox Biol 2014; 2:457-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.020
  15. González NV, Molinari G, Solones S, Larramendy ML. Genotoxicidad y citotoxidad de pesticidas. Evaluación de los principios activos y formulaciones comerciales usadas en Argentina. Theori 2008; 17(2):27-45.
  16. Montes VD, Montero Y, Roosi A, González H. Determinación de la genotoxicidad de la ivermectina a través del ensayo cometa. Rev Colomb Cienc Anim 2011; 3:321-327.
  17. Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol 2004. 26:249-261. https://doi.org/10.1385/MB:26:3:249
  18. Speit G, Rothfuss A. The comet assay: a sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage and repair. DNA Repair Protocols. Bjergbaek, L. editor. NY, USA; Springer-Media Busines Media: 2012.
  19. González TJ, Moreno RA, Quintana SM. Efecto genotóxico de las mezclas complejas de hidrocarburos en trabajadores de estaciones de servicio de gasolina. Salud Uninorte 2015; 31:91-100.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |