Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Evaluation of the postpartum reproductive behavior, influenced by the time of year and the breed in cattle under the dual purpose system

Evaluación del comportamiento reproductivo postparto, influido por la época del año y la raza en bovinos bajo el sistema doble propósito



Open | Download

How to Cite
Salgado O, R., Cury R, A., Ruiz C, R., & Alvarez P, J. (2017). Evaluation of the postpartum reproductive behavior, influenced by the time of year and the breed in cattle under the dual purpose system. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 7(1), 152-156. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1056

Dimensions
PlumX
Roger Salgado O
Any Cury R
Ricardo Ruiz C
Jaime Alvarez P

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect that exercises the time of the year and the race in the reproductive acting post - I leave of cows managed under the system of double purpose. 28 were used you vacate homogeneous multíparas in number of childbirths, production of milk, race, handling, sanity, environment, feeding and amamantamiento system. They were distributed in four treatments using a design totally at random, with a factorial arrangement 2 x 2, with two times (rain and drought) and two races (Cebú and it crossbreeds (30% Holstein and 70% Cebú)) with seven repetitions for group (combination: time x race): T1 - Drought x Crossbreeds; T2 - Drought x Cebú; T3 - Rain x Crossbreeds; T4 – Rain x Cebú. For the gestation rate and open days, he/she was difference statistically significant (P <0.05) in the gestation rate for the factor time in favor of the dry time of the year (92.85 vs 57.14%), while in the open days he/she was not significant differences (P>0.05) among times of the year, 92.71 ± 23.74 days for the dry time against 115.78 ± 47.35 days for the rainy time of the year. In the factor race, he/she was not significant differences (P>0.05) in the gestation rate (Cebú 78.57 vs mestizo 71.42%) and in the open days (Cebú 100.71 ± 31.76 mestizo vs 107.78 ± 45.35 days). This is an indication of the importance of the effect that you/they exercise the time of the year and the race in the reproductive behavior post - I leave in cows under the system of double purpose.


Article visits 837 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Bastidas P, Troconiz A F, Verde O, Silvao O. V. effect of restricted suckling on ovarian activity and uterine in volution in Brahaman cows. Theriogeneology 1989; 23:225.
  2. Blandon J, Aloizoi F, De Alencar C, Borela C, Carvalho V. Efecto da condiçao corporal do parto eda amamantaçao na eficiencia reproductiva de vacas de raça Nelore. Bras Zootec. 1997; 26:1090-1095.
  3. Ferreira P. Nutriçao e actividade ovariana em bovinos. Pesquisa agropecuaria brasileira. Brasilia 1993; 28:1077-1093.
  4. Garel J. P, Gauthier D. Petit M, Thimonier J. Influence of photoperiod ob the postpartum changes in live weight and ovarian function in suckled cows. Reprod Nutr Dev 1987; 27:305. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19870262
  5. Garverick H. A, Smith M. F. Female reproductive physiology and endocrinology of cattle. Vet Clin North Am 1993; 9:223-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30643-5
  6. Hansen P. J, Hauser E.R. Photoperiod alteration of postpartum reproductive function in suckled cows. Theriogeneology. 1984; 22:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90468-0
  7. Maza L. Alimentación estratégica de vacas lactantes Doble Propósito y su relación costo beneficio. Primer Simposio Nacional de Producción Animal de la Sabana. Sincelejo, Sucre. 2000.
  8. Navarrete M, Abuabara Y, Mendoza G, Martínez, Corredor G, Serrano G, Duenas G. Evaluación de la reproducción en ganaderías de Doble Propósito en Córdoba. Investigación ,pecuaria del centro de investigación Turipaná. Cereté, Colombia. 1994 - 1998; 49-63.
  9. Osoro K. Manejo de las reservas corporales y utilización de pasto en los sistemas de producción de carne con vacas madres establecidas en zonas húmedas. Invest Agr Prod San Anim 1989; 4:1-27.
  10. Pareja I, Suárez S, Rangel L. Incidencia del amamantamiento en la eficiencia reproductiva de vacas cebú mestizo en los Llanos Orientales. Revista El Cebú. 1985; Julio - Agosto.
  11. Peroza C, Castillo O. Situación actual del sector ganadero en Sucre. Fundación futuro para Sucre. 1995; 5-107.
  12. Peters A. R, Riley G. M. Reproductive activity of the cow in the postpartum period. I. Factors affecting the length of the postpartum acyclic period. B Vet J. 1984; 138:533.
  13. Prieto M, Espitia P, Alvarado A. Manejo postparto para mejorar la eficiencia reproductiva en vacas del sistema doble propósito y cría libre. Asocebú. 1999; 307:14-20.
  14. Randel R. D. Effect on daily suckling in ostpartum interval and cow - calf performance at first calf Brahman x Herefords heifers. J Anim Sci. 1981; 53:755. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.533755x
  15. Short R. E, Bellows R. A. Staigmiller R.B.; Berardinelli J. G. and Custer E. E. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and fertility in postpartum beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1990; 68:799- 816. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.683799x
  16. Vaccaro L, Mejía H, Pérez A. Factores genéticos y no genéticos que afectan la producción de bovinos de doble propósito. En: Memorias Seminario Internacional ''Estrategias de mejoramiento genético en la producción bovina tropical''. Medellín 1995; 70-77.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |