Effect of the use of fluazuron for control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle

Efecto del uso de fluazurón para control de Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus en bovinos

Published 2017-05-25

Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
How to Cite
Benavides O, E., Jiménez C, P., Betancur H, O., Vélez C, G., Polanco P, N., & Morales P, J. (2017). Effect of the use of fluazuron for control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in cattle. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 22(supl), 6050-6061. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1075
doi

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1075
Dimensions
PlumX
Efraín Benavides O
Universidad de La Salle, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Centro de Investigación en Medicina y Reproducción Animal, CIMRA, Cra. 7 No-179-03, Bogotá, Colombia.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8894-5441

Pablo Jiménez C
University of Georgia, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, USA
Oscar Betancur H
Global Bio Protection Technical Consultant, Elanco Animal Health
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-4748

Gabriel Vélez C
Asocebú - Ganadería San Gabriel, Fusagasugá
Natalia Polanco P
Universidad Estatal de Campinas, Instituto de Economia, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-5447

Jorge Morales P
Médico Veterinario, práctica particular
Show authors biography
Objective. To demonstrate the effect on the tick population of the use of fluazuron in grazing cattle. Materials and methods. Case study performed in Fusagasuga (Cundinamarca, Colombia); three groups of 25 heifers each were formed, G1= two applications of Fluazuron separated 60 days, G2= fluazuron applied only on study day 0 and G3= treated with a spray of chlorpyriphos. Periodically tick count was done in five animals of each group and the degree of contamination of pastures with tick larvae was determined by dragging. Results. Infestation levels between the groups were not homogeneous, and the paddocks also showed different levels of larval infestation. The compound was useful for protecting animals from tick infestation for more than eight weeks. Given the soil temperature in the region, the adult larva period is fulfilled between 50 and 65 days. Conclusion. The effect of treatment of cattle with fluazuron on larval contamination of pastures will only be reflected almost two months after treatment. Strategic design schemes must consider this component, of the soil temperature.

Article visits 2774 | PDF visits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Benavides E, Romero A. Consideraciones para el control integral de parásitos externos del ganado. Carta Fedegan 2001; 70:64-86.
  3. Foil LD, Coleman P, Eisler M, Fragoso-Sanchez H, Garcia-Vazquez Z, Guerrero FD, et al. Factors that influence the prevalence of acaricide resistance and tick-borne diseases. Vet Parasitol 2004; 125(1-2):163-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.05.012
  5. George JE, Pound JM, Davey RB. Chemical control of ticks on cattle and the resistance of these parasites to acaricides. Parasitology 2004; 129(Suppl):S353-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182003004682
  7. Nari A, Eddi C, Martins JR, Benavides E. Resistencia a los antiparasitarios: Estado actual con énfasis en América Latina. Estudio FAO Producción y Sanidad Animal 157. Roma: FAO; 2003.
  9. Benavides E, Romero A, Rodríguez JL. Situación actual de resistencia de la garrapata Boophilus microplus a acaricidas en Colombia. Recomendaciones de manejo integrado. Tercera Entrega. Carta Fedegan. 2000; 61:14-24.
  11. Benavides E, Rodríguez JL, Romero A. Isolation and partial characterization of the Montecitos strain of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1877) multiresistant to different acaricides. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 916:668-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05358.x
  13. Taylor MA. Recent developments in ectoparasiticides. Vet J 2001; 161(3):253-68. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0549
  15. Bull MS, Swindale S, Overend D, Hess EA. Suppression of Boophilus microplus populations with fluazuron--an acarine growth regulator. Aust Vet J 1996; 74(6):468-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb07575.x
  17. Graf JF. The role of insect growth regulators in arthropod control. Parasitol Today 1993; 9(12):471-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(93)90106-P
  19. Graf JF, Gogolewski R, Leach-Bing N, Sabatini GA, Molento MB, Bordin EL, Arantes GJ. Tick control: an industry point of view. Parasitology. 2004; 129(Suppl):S427-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004006079
  21. Holdsworth PA, Kemp D, Green P, Peter RJ, De Bruin C, Jonsson NN, et al. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of acaricides against ticks (Ixodidae) on ruminants. Vet Parasitol 2006; 136(1):29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.11.011
  23. Wharton RH, Utech KBW. The relation between engorgement and drooping of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Ixodidae) to the assessment of the tick numbers on cattle. J Aust Entomol Soc 1970; 9:171-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.1970.tb00788.x
  25. de la Vega R, Moreno A, Díaz G. Método de muestreo de la garrapata del ganado vacuno (Boophilus microplus) en vacas lecheras. Rev de Sal Anim 1984; 6:397-406.
  27. Roberts JA. Resistance of cattle to the tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). II. Stages of the life cycle of the parasite against which resistance is manifest. J Parasitol 1968; 54(4):667-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3277013
  29. Zimmerman RH, Garris GI. Sampling efficiency of three dragging techniques for the collection of nonparasitic Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) larvae in Puerto Rico. J Econ Entomol 1985; 78(3):627-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/78.3.627
  31. Wilkinson PR. The use of sampling methods in studies of the distribution of larvae of Boophilus microplus on pastures. Aust J Zool 1961; 9(5):752-83. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9610752
  33. Aycardi E, Benavides E, Garcia O, Mateus G, Henao F, Zuluaga FN. Boophilus microplus tick burdens on grazing cattle in Colombia. Trop Anim Health Prod 1984; 16(2):78-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02239849
  35. Benavides E. Observaciones sobre la fase no parasítica del ciclo evolutivo de Boophilus microplus en la altillanura Plana Colombiana. Rev ICA 1983; 18:513-24.
  37. Snowball GJ. Ecological observations on the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Crop Pasture Sci 1957; 8(4):394-413. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9570394
  39. Nari A. Strategies for the control of one-host ticks and relationship with tick-borne diseases in South America. Vet Parasitol 1995; 57(1-3):153-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)03117-F
  41. Hernández-A F, Teel PD, Corson MS, Grant WE. Simulation of rotational grazing to evaluate integrated pest management strategies for Boophilus microplus (Acari: ixodidae) in Venezuela. Vet Parasitol 2000; 92(2):139-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00282-X

Information

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

0.6
2020CiteScore
 
 
28th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Redib Widget
Tutorials

Autors:

How send article?

Evaluator pair

How to evaluate an article?

Keywords

QR code

Current Issue

Perfil de Google Scholar

Most read in the last 30 days

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |