Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effect of production system on milk production and food consumption in goats

Efecto del sistema de producción sobre producción de leche y consumo de alimento en cabras



Open | Download

How to Cite
Rúa B, C., Rosero N, R., & Posada O, S. (2017). Effect of production system on milk production and food consumption in goats. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 22(3), 6266-6275. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1131

Dimensions
PlumX
Clara Rúa B
Ricardo Rosero N
Sandra Posada O

Objective. Assessing the effect of productive system in production, composition of milk and feed consumption in goats s. Materials and methods. Three production systems were assessed in Antioquia Department, Colombia. Dry matter intake (DMI), dry matter digestibility (DMD), production and composition of milk were assessed during two periods for 71 goats, Saanen and Alpine breed type. Regarding the statistical analysis the individual effects of different variables were taken into account, such as production system, breed, period, and the interaction between them; using the use of PROC MIXED in the statistical software SAS.. Results. The production system named A1 (semi-stabling, grazing on grasslands with natural vegetation succession) presented the highest milk production per day in both periods, with an average of 1.2 L/day, as well as higher levels of fat, protein and non-fat milk solids (53, 33 and 84 g/day), compared to production systems A2 and A3 (permanent housing). These A2 and A3 systems presented an average of 0.6 L/day and dry matter intake (DMI) did not presented significant difference, however in vitro digestibility did. Conclusions. High variability was found in the assessed systems regarding the dry matter intake, as well as the composition of feed offered. There was also a significant effect in the production system on the amount of milk produced by animal per day.


Article visits 2236 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Colombia. Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural - MADR. Agenda prospectiva de investigación y desarrollo tecnológico para la cadena productiva cárnica ovino-caprina en Colombia [documento en Internet]. Bogotá; 2010. Disponible a partir de: http://docplayer.es/9854311-Agenda-prospectiva-de-investigacion-y-desarrollo-tecnologico-para-la-cadena-productiva-carnica-ovino-caprina-en-colombia.html
  2. Aréchiga CF, Aguilera JI, Rincón RM, De Lara SM, Ba-uelos VR, Meza-Herrera CA. Situación actual y perspectivas de la producción caprina ante el reto de la globalización. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyt. 2008; 9(1):1-14.
  3. Brito LF, Silva FG, Melo AL, Caetano GC, Torres RA, Rodrigues MT, et al. Genetic and environmental factors that influence production and quality of milk of Alpine and Saanen goats. Genet Mol Res. 2011; 10(4):3794-3802. https://doi.org/10.4238/2011.December.14.9
  4. García G, Caamal I, Sevilla H, Ortiz J, Vázquez A, Castro F, et al. Interacción genotipo x ambiente en cabras lecheras. Bioagrociencias. 2011; 4(2):23-27.
  5. Morand-Fehr P. Recent developments in goat nutrition and application: A review. Small Rumin Res. 2005; 60(1):25-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.004
  6. Holdridge LR. Life zone ecology. San Jose: Tropical Science Center; 1967.
  7. Helrich KC, editor. Official methods of Analysis of the AOAC. Vol 2. 15th ed. Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc; 1990.
  8. Ochoa OE, Infante RB, Rivera CJ. Hacia una definición de fibraalimentaria. An Ven Nutr. 2008; 21(1):25-30
  9. Rodríguez NM, Saliba EO, Guimarães-Júnior R. Uso de indicadores para estimar consumo y digestibilidad de pasto. LIPE, lignina purificada y enriquecida. Rev Col Cienc Pec. 2007;20(4):12.
  10. Naranjo JF, Cuartas CA. Caracterización nutricional y de la cinética de degradación ruminal de algunos de los recursos forrajeros con potencial para la suplementación de rumiantes en el trópico alto de Colombia. Rev CES Med Zootec. 2011;6(1):9-19.
  11. Giraldo L, Gutiérrez LA, Rúa C. Comparación de dos técnicas in vitro e in situ para estimar la digestibilidad verdadera en varios forrajes tropicales. Rev Col Cienc Pec. 2009; 20(3), 269-279
  12. Conover, WJ. Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 1999
  13. Zamora R, Salvador A, Alvarado C, Betancourt, R. Producción y composición de la leche y queso fresco pasteurizado de cabras mestizas canarias suplementadas con grasa sobrepasante. Rev Fac Cienc Vet. 2011; 52(1):39-49.
  14. Lee ID, Lee HS. A study on the dry matter intake, body weight gain and required animal unit of grazing dairy goats (Saanen) in mixture. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2009; 29(4):383-388. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.4.383
  15. Zamora JR, Salazar JA. Consumo, calidad nutricional y digestibilidad aparente de morera ("Morus alba") y pasto estrella ("Cynodon nlemfuensis") en cabras. Agr Costarr. 2012; 36(1):13-23.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |