Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Presence of gastrointestinal parasites in swine and human of four swine production farms in Cundinamarca- Colombia

Presence of gastrointestinal parasites in swine and human of four swine production farms in Cundinamarca- Colombia



How to Cite
Mendoza-Gómez M. F., Pulido-Villamarín A., Barbosa-Buitrago, A., & Aranda-Silva, M. (2015). Presence of gastrointestinal parasites in swine and human of four swine production farms in Cundinamarca- Colombia. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 20(supl), 5014-5027. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.15

Dimensions
PlumX
María F Mendoza-Gómez
Adriana Pulido-Villamarín
Angélica Barbosa-Buitrago
Moisés Aranda-Silva

ABSTRACT

Objectives. Determine the presence and the type of endoparasites with zoonotic potential in swine and human of two technified and two semi-technified farms in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia. Materials and methods. Three serial samplings of feces were taken in a pen row within intervals of 15 days, in two technified and two semi-technified farms in different age groups distributed as follows: pregnant-sows, nursing-females, boars, weaners, suckling-piglets, and growing-pig. By means of informed consent thirty-three people agreed to enter the study. Thirty-three samples from men and women of different ages were received. The pool and individual samples of fecal were evaluated by direct analysis, qualitative flotation and sedimentation techniques and modified Ziehl- Neelsen stain. Results. For the porcine population, on the average, the results obtained from both technified farms showed that Balantidium coli (42%), Endolimax nana (21.9%) and Iodamoeba bütschlii (7.8%) were the most common parasites. In semi-technified farms they were: Entamoeba coli (40%), Endolimax nana (35%), Iodamoeba bütschlii (25%) and Balantidium coli (5%). By means of the test chi2 it is possible to conclude that there is a significant difference between the parasites species and the type of farm. The results obtained in human showed the presence of parasites as: E. coli (42.2%), Entamoeba hystolitica/dispar (12.1%), E. nana (9.1%), B. coli (9.1%), I. bütschlii (3.0%) and Blastocystis hominis (3.0%). Conclusions. The presence of parasites such as Balantidium coli, Endolimax nana, Iodamoeba bütschlii and Entamoeba coli in swine and human suggests a possible rotation of parasitic species between hosts.


Article visits 1426 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. DANE. Oferta agropecuaria. [in line] 2013. [Accessed 24 de Jun 2014].URL Available in: https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/agropecuario/ena/2013/boletin_ena_2013.pdf
  2. Frontera E, Bravo D, Blanco J, Herrador P, Calero R, Serrano F, et al. Las parasitosis porcinas y sus repercusiones económicas. Suis 2012; 87:18- 27.
  3. Frontera E, Pérez M, Alcaide M, Reina D. Patología parasitaria porcina: en imágenes. Espa-a: Ed. Servet; 2009.
  4. Cordero del Campillo M, Rojo F, Martínez A, Sánchez M, Hernández S, Navarrete I, et al. Parasitología Veterinaria. Espa-a: Ed. McGraw-Hill; 2000.
  5. Weese J S, Fulford M B. Companion animal zoonoses. USA: Ed Wilwy-Blackwell; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470958957
  6. Beck W, Pantechev N. Zoonosis parasitarias. Espa-a; Ed. Servet: 2009.
  7. Solaymani-Mohammadi S, Petri W. Zoonotic implications of the swine-transmitted protozoal infections. Vet Parasitol 2006; 140(3-4):189-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.012
  8. IDEAM. Boletín informativo sobre el monitoreo de los fenómenos de variabilidad climática. Boletín número 49. [En linea]. 2012. URL Disponible en: http://www.pronosticosyalertas.gov.co/jsp/894
  9. IDEAM. Boletín informativo sobre el monitoreo de los fenómenos de variabilidad climática. Boletín número 55. [En linea]. 2013. URL Disponible en: http://www.pronosticosyalertas.gov.co/jsp/894
  10. Bornay F, Navarro L, Garcia F, Araez H, Perez M, Moral R. Detection of intestinal parasites in pig slurry: A preliminary study from five farms in Spain. Livest Sci 2006; 102(3):237-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.03.023
  11. Gerwert S, Failing K, Bauer C. Husbandry management, worm control practices and gastro-intestinal parasite infections of sows in pig-breeding farms in Munsterland, Germany. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2004; 111(10):398-403.
  12. Hayriye K, Bora Ö, Metiner K, Ilgaz A. Investigation of Intestinal Parasites in Pig Feces That Are also Human Pathogens. Türkiye Parazitol Derg 2009; 33(3):218-221.
  13. Navone T, Gamboa M, Kozubsky L, Costas M, Sisliauska M, Gonzalez M. Estudio comparativo de recuperación de formas parasitarias por tres diferentes métodos de enriquecimiento coproparasitologico. Parasitol Latinoam 2005; 60(3-4):178-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-77122005000200014
  14. Pajuelo G, Lujan D, Paredes B, Tello L. Aplicación de la técnica de sedimentación espontanea en tubo en el diagnóstico de parásitos intestinales. Rev Biomed. 2006; 17(2):96-101.
  15. FAO. Techniques for parasite assays and identification in faecal samples. [On line] 2010. [Accessed 24 de Jun 2014]. URL Available in: http://www.fao.org/Wairdocs/ILRI/x5492E/x5492e05.htm
  16. Del Coco V, Córdoba M, Basualdo J. Cryptosporidium infection in calves from a rural area of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Vet Parasitol 2008; 158(1-2):31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.08.018
  17. Weng B, Hu, Li Y, Lin Q, Xie H, Gasser B, Zhu Q. Survey of intestinal parasites in pigs from intensive farms in guangdong province, people's republic of china. Vet Parasitol 2005; 127(3-4):333-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.030
  18. Fe Rodríguez P, Alberto E B, Aguiar J, Rodríguez L, Hernández J A. Estudio de la prevalencia de las endoparasitosis que afectan a los cerdos en el territorio de Cuba. Rev Electrón Vet 2007; 8(4):1-15.
  19. Naquira C. Las zoonosis parasitarias: problema de salud pública en el Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2010; 27(4):494-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1726-46342010000400001
  20. Peguero Y, Guerra Y, Mencho J, Vázquez A. Comparación del parasitismo gastrointestinal en cerdos estatales y privados en diferentes categorías. REDVET 2006; 18(2):141-144.
  21. Ryan M, Monis, Heidi L. Enemark I, Sulaiman B, Samarasinghe C, Read R. "Cryptosporidium suis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in pigs (Susscrofa)." J Parasitol 2004; 90(4):769-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-202R1
  22. Schuster, Frederick L, Ramirez-Avila, Lynn. Current World Status of Balantidium coli. J Parasitol 2008; 21(4):626-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00021-08
  23. Solarte Y, Pe-a M, Madera C. Transmisión de protozoarios patógenos a través del agua para consumo humano. Colomb Med 2007; 38(1):74-82.
  24. Mata C, Chaves H. Balantidiasis presentación de un caso clínico. Rev Méd Universidad de Costa Rica. 2010; 5(1):58-62
  25. Byomi A, Samaha H, Zidan S. Epidemiological studies on some zoonotic enteric protozoa in different areas of Nile delta. JASMR 2010; 5(2):199-207.
  26. Thompson R, Smith A. Zoonotic enteric protozoa. Vet Parasitol 2011; 182(1):70-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.016
  27. Nejsum P, Betson M, Bendall RP, Thamsborg SM, Stothard JR. Assessing the zoonotic potential of Ascaris suum and Trichuris suis: looking to the future from an analysis of the past. Journ helm 2012; 86(2): 148-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X12000193

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |