Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Hydropower effects on Prochilodus magdalenae (Prochilodontidae) reproduction: evidence from endocrine response

Efectos de la generación de energía hidroeléctrica en la reproducción de Prochilodus magdalenae (Prochilodontidae): evidencia de la respuesta endocrina



How to Cite
De Fex-Wolf, D., López-Casas, S., & Jiménez-Segura, L. F. (2019). Hydropower effects on Prochilodus magdalenae (Prochilodontidae) reproduction: evidence from endocrine response. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 24(2), 7180-7187. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1606

Dimensions
PlumX
Daniela De Fex-Wolf
Silvia López-Casas
Luz Fernanda Jiménez-Segura

Objective. Describe the endocrine response associated with the reproduction of a tropical potamodromous fish under changes in the flow discharge produced by hydropower in an Andean. Materials and methods. We analyzed Prochilodus magdalenae reproduction in individuals from two sectors of a Neotropical river basin: one with the natural flow and the other with a regulated hydrological regime. Results. In the sector of the basin with the natural flow we found that the production of hormones related with fish reproduction (FSH and LH) was correlated with the gonadosomatic index, while in fish experiencing hydropeaking due to hydroelectric operation no such correlation was detected. Conclusions. Hormone production associated to reproduction of the Potamodromous fish was sensitive to changes in water level and discharge. Then, fish exposed to hydropeaking would be receiving ambiguous stimuli that affect hormone production, reproduction synchronization with environmental cues, and ripening, which are essential for reproductive success.


Article visits 1925 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Junk W, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. The flood pulse concept in river flood plain systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1989; 106:110-127. http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/111846.pdf
  2. Lowe-McConnell RH. Ecological studies in tropical fish communities. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511721892
  3. Pelicice FM, Pompeu PS, Agostinho AA. Large reservoirs as ecological barriers to downstream movements of Neotropical migratory fish. Fish Fish. 2015; 16: 697-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12089
  4. Jiménez-Segura LF, Palacio J, Leite R. River flooding and reproduction of migratory fish species in the Magdalena River basin, Colombia. Ecol Freshw Fish. 2010; 19:178-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2009.00402.x
  5. Sousa Raniere GC, Freitas CE de C. The influence of flood pulse on fish communities of floodplain canals in the Middle Solimões River, Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 2008; 6(2):249-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252008000200013
  6. Britto SG de C, Carvalho ED. Reproductive migration of fish and movement in a series of reservoirs in the Upper Parana River basin, Brazil. Fish Manag Ecol. 2013; 20: 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12030
  7. Murchie KJ, Hair KPE, Pullen CE, Redpath TD, Stephens HR, Cooke, S. Fish response to modified flow regimes in regulated rivers: research methods, effects and opportunities. River Res Appl. 2008; 24:197-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1058
  8. Winemiller KO, McIntyre PB, Castello L, Fluet-Chouinard E, Giarrizzo T, Nam S, et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science. 2016; 351(6269):128-129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082
  9. Macnaughton CJ, McLaughlin F, Bourque G, Senay C, Lanthier G, Harvey-Lavoie S, Legendre P, Lapointe M, Boisclair D. The Effects of Regional Hydrologic Alteration on Fish Community Structure in Regulated Rivers. River Res Appl. 2015; 33(2):249-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2991
  10. Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Santos CL, Ortega JCG, Pelicice FM. Fish assemblages in Neotropical reservoirs: Colonization patterns, impacts and management. Fish Res. 2016; 173(1):26-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.04.006
  11. Gonzalez R, Shepperd E, Thiruppugazh V, Lohan S, Grey CL, Chang JP, Unniappan S. Nesfatin-1 Regulates the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis of Fish. Biol Reprod. 2012; 87(4):1–11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.099630
  12. Vongvatcharanona U, Binaleeb F, Suwanjaratb J, Boonyounga P. Immunocytochemical identification of gonadotropic cell types and changes in cell numbers during annual reproductive cycle in pituitary gland of adult male sand goby, Oxyeleotris marmoratus. ScienceAsia. 2006; 32:337-343. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2006.32.337
  13. Mousa MA, Ibrahim AA, Hashem AM, Khalil NA. The effect of water quality on the immunoreactivity of stress-response cells and gonadotropin-secreting cells in the pituitary gland of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. J Exp Zool. 2014; 323A:146–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1901 PMID: 25675939
  14. Mylonas CC, Fostier A, Zanuy S. Broodstock management and hormonal manipulations of fish reproduction. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010; 165(3):516-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.03.007 PMid: 19318108
  15. Bailly D, Agostinho AA, Suzuki HI. Influence of the flood regime on the reproduction of fish species with different reproductive strategies in the Cuiabá River, Upper Pantanal, Brazil. River Res. Applic. 2008; 24:1218–1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1147
  16. Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH. Fishes of the World. Wiley: USA; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174844
  17. González J, Hernández G, Messia O, Pérez A. Extracto hipofisiario de Coporo (Prochilodus mariae) como agente inductor sustitutivo en la reproducción de su misma especie. Zootecnia Tropical. 2010; 28(1):25-32.
  18. Higgins A, Restrepo JC, Otero LJ, Ortiz JC, Mario C. Distribución vertical de sedimentos en suspensión en la zona de desembocadura del Río Magdalena, Colombia. Lat Am J Aquat Res. 2017; 45(4):724-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3856/vol45-issue4-fulltext-9
  19. UPME- Unidad de Planeación Minero-Energética. Informe de Gestión 2012. [En línea] Bogotá: UPME; 2012. URL Disponible en: http://www1.upme.gov.co/InformesGestion/Informe_gestion_2012.pdf
  20. Vazzoler AEA de M. Biología da reprodução de peixes teleósteos: teoría e práctica. São Paulo, Brasil: EDUEM; 1996.
  21. Suzuki K, Kawauchi H and Nagahama Y. Isolation and characterization of two distinct gonadotropins from chum salmon pituitary glands. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988a; 71:292-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(88)90257-2
  22. Suzuki K, Kawauchi H and Nagahama Y. Isolation and characterization of subunits from two distinct salmon gonadotropins. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1988b; 71:302-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(88)90258-4
  23. Shi SR, Guo J, Cote RJ, Young L, Hawes D, Shi Y, Thu S, Taylor CR. Sensitivity and Detection Efficiency of a Novel Two-Step Detection System (PowerVision) for Immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 1999; 7(3):201-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00129039-199909000-00005
  24. López-Casas S, Jiménez-Segura LF, Agostinho AA, Pérez CM. Potamodromous migrations in the Magdalena River basin: bimodal reproductive patterns in neotropical rivers. J Fish Biol. 2016; 1(89):157-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12941
  25. Fitzgerald DB, Winemiller KO, Sabaj Pérez MH, Sousa LM. Seasonal changes in the assembly mechanisms structuring tropical fish communities. Ecology. 2017; 98:21-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1616
  26. Santos EM, Rand-Weaver M, Tyler CR. Follicle stimulating hormone and its alpha and beta subunits in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Purification, characterization, development of radioimmunoassays, and their seasonal plasma and pituitary concentrations in females. Biol Reprod. 2001; 65:288-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.1.288
  27. Luz-Agostinho KDG, Agostinho AA, Gomes LC, Júlio-Jr HF, Fugi R. Effects of flooding regime on the feeding activity and body condition of piscivorous fish in the Upper Paraná River floodplain. Braz J Biol. 2009; 69(2 Suppl):481-490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842009000300004 PMid: 19738956
  28. Blanco-Libreros JF, Taborda-Marín A, Amortegui-Torres V, Arroyave-Rincón A, Sandoval A, Estrada EA, et al. Deforestación y sedimentación en los manglares del Golfo de Urabá. Síntesis de los impactos sobre la fauna macrobéntica e íctica en el delta del río Turbo. Gestión y Ambiente. 2013; 16(2): 19-36. URL Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/gestion/article/view/39560

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |