Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Retrospective Study On Cystic Echinococcosis in Livestock in Northern Türkiye

Estudio retrospectivo sobre equinococosis quística en animales de granja en el norte de Türkiye



How to Cite
Dal, A. G., TERZİ, F. ., DAL, F. ., PEHLİVAN, Şakir ., TÜRLEK, Şakir Önder ., Kaya, S. ., & ÇIBIK, R. . (2023). Retrospective Study On Cystic Echinococcosis in Livestock in Northern Türkiye. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 28(2), e3086. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.3086

Dimensions
PlumX
Ayşe Gül Dal
FatmaNur DAL
Şakir PEHLİVAN
Şakir Önder TÜRLEK
Selma Kaya

Ayşe Gül Dal,

1 Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Bursa, Türkiye İstanbul.

4 Bursa Uludağ University, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Bursa,

7 Samsun Veterinary Research Institute, Samsun, Türkiye.


Funda TERZİ,

Kastamonu University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Kastamonu, Türkiye.


FatmaNur DAL,

3 İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, İstanbul, Türkiye.

5 İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Institute of Graduate Studies, İstanbul, Türkiye.


Şakir PEHLİVAN,

İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Institute of Graduate Studies, İstanbul, Türkiye.


Şakir Önder TÜRLEK,

6 Ondokuz Mayıs University, Graduate School of Education, Samsun, Türkiye.

7 Samsun Veterinary Research Institute, Samsun, Türkiye.


Selma Kaya,

Samsun Veterinary Research Institute, Samsun, Türkiye.


Recep ÇIBIK,

Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Bursa, Türkiye İstanbul.


Objective. This study was conducted retrospectively to assess the cystic echinococcosis status of farm animals from the samples sent to Samsun Veterinary Control Institute of the Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, between January 2016 and December 2022. Materials and Methods. A total of 818 sheep, 160 goats, and 990 cattle necropsy materials were examined macroscopically and histopathologically according to World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) guidelines. Cysts were detected in 61 of examined materials. Results. The rate of total cystic echinococcosis positivity in farm animals was found to be 3.1% in northern Türkiye. Cysts were detected in at least one of the liver and lungs. It was detected in the liver in 24 cases (39.3%), the lung in 23 cases (37.7%), and both the lung and liver in 11 cases (18%). In addition, cysts were found in both of lung and spleen (1 case), kidney and liver (1 case), and heart and liver (1 case). The positivity rate was higher in sheep than in other ruminants, and the difference with other ruminant species was statistically significant. (p<0.001). The difference between prevalence rates by years was found to be statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusions. Türkiye is defined as a highly endemic region for Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis. Surveillance should be done regularly to implement control programs. The information presented in this study will contribute to gaining an idea about the status of cystic echinococcosis in livestock in northern Türkiye and to the development of prevention and control strategies.


Article visits 215 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Thompson RCA. Biology and Systematics of Echinococcus. Adv Parasitol. 2017; 95:65–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2016.07.001
  2. Vuitton DA, McManus DP, Rogan MT, Romig T, Gottstein B, Naidich A, et al. International consensus on terminology to be used in the field of echinococcoses. Parasite. 2020; 27:41. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2020024
  3. Deplazes P, Rinaldi L, Alvarez Rojas CA, Torgerson PR, Harandi MF, Romig T, et al. Global Distribution of Alveolar and Cystic Echinococcosis. Adv Parasitol. 2017; 95:315-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2016.11.001
  4. Deplazes P, Hegglin D, Gloor S, Romig T. Wilderness in the city: the urbanization of Echinococcus multilocularis. Trends Parasitol. 2004; 20(2):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2003.11.011
  5. Woolsey ID, Miller AL. Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato and Echinococcus multilocularis: A review. Res Vet Sci. 2021; 135:517–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.11.010
  6. Heidari Z, Sharbatkhori M, Mobedi I, Mirhendi SH, Nikmanesh B, Sharifdini M, Mohebali M, Zarei Z, Arzamani K, Kia EB. Echinococcus multilocularis and Echinococcus granulosus in canines in North-Khorasan Province, northeastern Iran, identified using morphology and genetic characterization of mitochondrial DNA. Parasit Vectors. 2019; 12(1):606. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3859-z
  7. Liu CN, Xu YY, Cadavid-Restrepo AM, Lou ZZ, Yan H Bin, Li L, et al. Estimating the prevalence of Echinococcus in domestic dogs in highly endemic for echinococcosis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018; 7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0458-8
  8. Holcman B, Heath DD. The early stages of Echinococcus granulosus development. Acta Trop. 1997; 64(1–2):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-706x(96)00636-5
  9. Golassa L, Abebe T, Hailu A. Evaluation of crude hydatid cyst fluid antigens for the serological diagnosis of hydatidosis in cattle. J Helminthol. 2011; 85(1):100–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X10000349
  10. Siracusano A, Delunardo F, Teggi A, Ortona E. Host-parasite relationship in cystic echinococcosis: An evolving story. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012; 2012:639362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/639362
  11. Gürler AT, Bölükbaş CS, Açıcı M, Umur Ş. Overview of Echinococcus multilocularis in Turkey and in the World. Turkiye parazitolojii Derg. 2019; 43(1):18–35. https://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2019.6300
  12. Altıntaş N, Topluoğlu S, Yıldırım A, Uslu H, Ekşi F, Ok ÜZ, et al. Current Situation Report Of Cystic Echinococcosis in Turkey/Türkiye’de Kistik Ekinokokkoz Mevcut Durum Raporu. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg, 2020; 77(Suppl:3):1-52 https://doi.org/10.5505/TurkHijyen.2020.34976
  13. Budke CM, Deplazes P, Torgerson PR. Global Socioeconomic Impact of Cystic Echinococcosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12(2):296-303. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1202.050499
  14. Kern P, Menezes da Silva A, Akhan O, Müllhaupt B, Vizcaychipi KA, Budke C, Vuitton DA. The Echinococcoses: Diagnosis, Clinical Management and Burden of Disease. Adv Parasitol. 2017; 96:259-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2016.09.006
  15. Craig P, Mastin A, van Kesteren F, Boufana B. Echinococcus granulosus: Epidemiology and state-of-the-art of diagnostics in animals. Vet Parasitol. 2015; 213(3–4):132–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.028
  16. WOAH. Echinococcosis (Infection With Echinococcus granulosus and with E. multilocularis). Chapter 3.1.6. OİE Terrestrial Manual; 2022. https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/3.01.06_ECHINOCOCCOSIS.pdf
  17. Simsek S, Balkaya I, Koroglu E. Epidemiological survey and molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in cattle in an endemic area of eastern Turkey. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 172(3–4):347–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.05.016
  18. Durgun C, Alkan S, Durgun M, Demiray EKD. Türkiye’ den Kist Hidatik Konusunda Yapılmıs Yayınların Analizi. Black Sea J Heal Sci. 2022;5(1):45–49. https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.937804
  19. Özgür T, Kaya ÖA, Hakverdi S, Akın M, Hamamcı B, Yaldız M. Retrospective evaluation of the echinococcosis cases regarding histopathological aspects. Dicle Med Journal/Dicle Tıp Derg. 2013; 40(4):641–644. https://doi.org/10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2013.04.0348
  20. Baş Y, Beyhan YE, Şahin HHK, Özçerezci T, Karasartova D, Güreser AS, et al. Evaluation of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue Samples Diagnosed by Histopathology as Echinococcus in Çorum Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2021; 45(4):262–267. https://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2021.22931
  21. Bhutani N, Kajal P. Hepatic echinococcosis: A review. Ann Med Surg. 2018; 36:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.10.032
  22. Jawad RA, Sulbi IM, Jameel YJ. Epidemiological study of the prevalence of hydatidosis in ruminants at the Holy City of Karbala, Iraq. Ann Parasitol. 2018; 64(3):211-215. https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6403.154
  23. Shahzad W, Abbas A, Munir R, Khan MS, Avais M, Ahmad J, et al. A PCR analysis of prevalence of Echinococcus granulosus genotype G1 in small and large ruminants in three districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Zool. 2014; 46(6):1541–1544. http://zsp.com.pk/pdf46/1541-1544%20(9)%20PJZ-1721-14%2021-9-14%20paper%20E.pdf
  24. Lahmar S, Trifi M, Ben Naceur S, Bouchhima T, Lahouar N, Lamouchi I, et al. Cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered domestic ruminants from Tunisia. J Helminthol. 2013; 87(3):318–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X12000430
  25. Varcasia A, Canu S, Kogkos A, Pipia AP, Scala A, Garippa G, et al. Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep and goats of Peloponnesus, Greece. Parasitol Res. 2007; 101(4):1135–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0568-x
  26. Cardona GA, Carmena D. A review of the global prevalence, molecular epidemiology and economics of cystic echinococcosis in production animals. Vet Parasitol. 2013; 192(1–3):10–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.027
  27. Oğuz B, Değer S. Van Belediye Mezbahasında Kesilen Sığır ve Koyunlarda Taenia hydatigena Sistiserkozusu ve Kistik ekinokokkozis/Cystic echinococcosis and cysticerci of Taenia hydatigena in cattle and sheep slaughtered in a Van Local Slaughterhouse. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2013; 37(3):186–189. https://cms.turkiyeparazitolderg.org/Uploads/Article_23215/TPD-37-186.pdf
  28. Fidan N, Terim Kapakin KA. Ordu ve Erzurum Yörelerinde Sığır Akciğerlerinin Paraziter Enfeksiyonlarının Histopatolojik Yönden İncelenmesi. Ataturk Univ Vet Bilim Derg. 2016; 11(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.17094/avbd.30198
  29. Karaman U, Enginyurt Ö, Gürgör PN. Cystic Echinicoccosis of Cattle and Sheep in Ordu. Middle Black Sea J Heal Sci. 2015; 1(2):8. https://doi.org/10.19127/mbsjohs.56265
  30. Addy F, Alakonya A, Wamae N, Magambo J, Mbae C, Mulinge E, et al. Prevalence and diversity of cystic echinococcosis in livestock in Maasailand, Kenya. Parasitol Res. 2012; 111(6):2289–2294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3082-8 ..
  31. Azlaf R, Dakkak A. Epidemiological study of the cystic echinococcosis in Morocco. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 137(1–2):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.003
  32. Yıldız K, Gürcan S. Prevalence of hydatidosis and fertility of hydatid cysts in sheep in Kirikkale, Turkey. Acta Vet Hung. 2003; 51(2):181–187. https://doi.org/10.1556/AVet.51.2003.2.6
  33. Diker AI, Tinar R, Senlik B. Viability of Echinococcus granulosus protoscolices at different conditions. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 150(1–2):84–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.08.030
  34. Kurt A, Avcioglu H, Guven E, Balkaya I, Oral A, Kirman R, Bia MM, Akyuz M. Molecular Characterization of Echinococcus multilocularis and Echinococcus granulosus from Cysts and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples of Human Isolates in Northeastern Turkey. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020; 20(8):593-602. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2019.2594
  35. Ministry Of Agriculture And Forestry of Türkiye. Hayvansal Gıdalar İçin Özel Hijyen Kuralları Yönetmeliği. Turkey; 2011. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/File/GeneratePdf?mevzuatNo=15664&mevzuatTur=KurumVeKurulusYonetmeligi&mevzuatTertip=5
  36. Ministry of Agriculture And Forestry. Onaylı İşletme Listesi. Turkey; 2022. https://ggbs.tarim.gov.tr/cis/servlet/StartCISPage?PAGEURL=/FSIS/ggbs.onayliIsletmeSorgu.html&POPUPTITLE=AnaMenu
  37. Tosun D, Demirbaş N. Compliance level of the enterprises in the red meat and meat products industry with food safety criteria: A case study from İzmir and Afyonkarahisar provinces. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Derg. 2021; 58(4):579–590. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.847997
  38. Ministry Of Agriculture And Forestry. İnsan Tüketimi Amacıyla Kullanılmayan Hayvansal Yan Ürünler Yönetmeliği. Turkey; 2011. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=15648&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |