Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Economic evaluation of a long-term supplementation feeding scheme in grazing local goats

Evaluación económica de un esquema de alimentación complementaria continua en cabras locales en pastoreo



How to Cite
Maldonado-Jáquez, J. A., Mora-Flores, J. S. ., Granados-Rivera, L. D. ., Hernández-Mendo, O. ., Gallegos-Sánchez, J. ., & Torres-Hernández, G. (2024). Economic evaluation of a long-term supplementation feeding scheme in grazing local goats. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 29(3), e3395. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.3395

Dimensions
PlumX

Jorge A Maldonado-Jáquez,

Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo. Programa de Ganadería. Montecillo, Estado de México, México. 

Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). Campo Experimental La Laguna. Matamoros, Coahuila, México.


José S Mora-Flores,

Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo. Programa de Economía. Montecillo, Estado de México, México.


Lorenzo D Granados-Rivera,

Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). Campo Experimental General Terán. General Terán, Nuevo León, México.


Omar Hernández-Mendo,

Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo. Programa de Ganadería. Montecillo, Estado de México, México


Jaime Gallegos-Sánchez,

Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo. Programa de Ganadería. Montecillo, Estado de México, México


Glafiro Torres-Hernández,

Colegio de Postgraduados. Campus Montecillo. Programa de Ganadería. Montecillo, Estado de México, México. 


Objective. To evaluate the economic viability of incorporating a long term-supplementary feeding scheme in grazing local goats from the last third of gestation and throughout lactation. Materials and methods. Twenty-four local goats were utilized: control group (CG, n=12) and supplemented group (SG; n=12). Daily milk production (DMP) was recorded in goats, per lactation (MPLT), and per lactation stage [early (MPEL) middle (MPML), and late lactation (MPLL)], duration of lactation (DL; days), final live weight (FLW), and final body condition (FBC). In kids, birth weight (BW), weight at sale (WS), age at sale (AS), and mortality rate were recorded. The economic analysis considered the costs of daily supplementation, labor for handling and care of the animals, and sale prices of milk and kids. Results. The best productive behavior and the highest incomes were obtained in SG (p<0.05) for all variables, except AS and mortality rate. The highest values in CG (p<0.05) were obtained in AS and economic profit in almost all the considered variables, Except in MPEL. Positive profits were obtained in SG in early and middle lactation, and negative in late lactation for SG, but with higher FBC. Conclusions. A long-term supplementary feeding is economically viable to increase income and profits from kids and milk sales and improves the body condition of the dams, which will benefit the productivity of the herd.


Article visits 216 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Castel JM, Ruiz FA, Mena Y, Sánchez-Rodríguez M. Present situation and future perspectives for goat production systems in Spain. Small Rum Res. 2010; 89(2-3):207-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.045
  2. Ayalew W, King JM, Bruns E, Rischkowsky B. Economic evaluation of smallholder subsistence livestock production: lessons from an Ethiopian goat development program. Ecolog Econ. 2003; 45(3):473-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00098-3
  3. Alex R, Cheemani RK, Thomas N. Returns and determinants of technical efficiency in small-scale Malabari goat production units in Kerala, India. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013; 45:1663-1668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0411-6
  4. Lozano-Jaramillo M, Alemu SW, Dessie T, Komen H, Bastiaansen JWM. Using phenotypic distribution models to predict livestock performance. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:15371. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51910-6
  5. Torres-Hernández G, Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Granados-Rivera LD, Wurzinger M, Cruz-Tamayo AA. Creole goats in Latin America and the Caribbean: a priceless resource to ensure the well-being of rural communities. Int J Agric Sust. 2022; 20(4):368-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1933361
  6. Rodríguez LG, Tapia RMZ, Puente BJJ, Palma RKJ. Análisis productivo-económico y especial de sistemas caprinos multifuncionales. Avanc Invest Agrop. 2021; 25(3):176-177. https://doi.org/10.53897/RevAIA.21.25.47
  7. Abou-Elkhair R, Mahboub H, Sadek K, Kektat S. Effect of prepartum dietary energy source on goat maternal metabolic profile, neonatal performance, and economic profitability. J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2020; 7(3):566-574. http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2020.g454
  8. McGregor BA. Effects of supplementary feeding Lucerne hay and barley grain to Angora does during the last third of pregnancy and lactation, and of litter size on pasture, birth weight, live weight, parasitism, milk production, milk composition and mohair production. Small Ruminant Research. 2020; 195:106303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.10630
  9. Rejón M, Magaña M, Pech V, Santos J. Evaluación económica de los sistemas de producción bovina de cría y de doble propósito en Tzucacab, Yucatán, México. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 17(1):30. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/1/rejo17013.htm
  10. Aguilera-Díaz A. El costo-beneficio como herramienta de decisión en la inversión en actividades científicas. COFIN Habana. 2017. 12(2):322-343. https://revistas.uh.cu/cofinhab/article/view/1024
  11. Góngora-Pérez RD, Góngora-Pérez SF, Magaña-Magaña MA, Lara y Lara PE. Caracterización socioeconómica de la producción ovina en el estado de Yucatán, México. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2010. 21(1):131-144. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v21i1.4919
  12. Isidro-Requejo LM, Meza-Herrera CA, Pastor-López FJ, Maldonado JA, Salinas-González H. Physicochemical characterization of goat milk produced in the Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. Anim Sci J. 2019; 90(4):563-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13173
  13. García E. Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen. Quinta edición. Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México. 2004. http://www.publicaciones.igg.unam.mx/index.php/ig/catalog/book/83
  14. Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Castañeda-Bustos VJ, Granados-Rivera LD, Salinas-González H, Pastor-López FJ, Torres-Hernández G. Growth curve and rates of absolute and relative growth of local kid goats in northern Mexico. Trop Subtrop Agroec. 2021; 24(2):75 http://dx.doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.3515
  15. Granados-Rivera LD, Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Bautista-Martínez Y, Garay-Martínez JR, Álvarez-Ojeda MG. El horario de complementación alimenticia modifica la respuesta productiva de cabras lecheras en pastoreo. Rev MVZ Córdoba. 2022; 27(1):e2340. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.2340
  16. Barrera POT, Sagarnaga VLM, Salas GJM, Leos RJA, Santos LR. Viabilidad económica y financiera de la ganadería caprina extensiva en San Luis Potosí, México. Mundo Agrario. 2018; 19(40):e077, https://doi.org/10.24215/15155994e077
  17. Vargas-Canales JM, Palacios-Rangel MI, Acevedo-Peralta AI, Leos-Rodríguez JA. Profitability analysis for natural rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) production in Oaxaca, Mexico. Rev Chapingo Serie Cienc Forest Amb. 2016; 22(1):45-58. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.02.005
  18. Mora-Valverde D. Sistema de producción a pequeña escala de dulce de leche caprino en Costa Rica. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 2012; 23(1):151-158. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v23i1.6413
  19. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. InfoStat, versión 2008, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba: Argentina; 2008. https://www.infostat.com.ar/
  20. Ramos-Martínez J, Salinas-González H, Medina-Elizondo M, Figueroa-Viramontes U, Maldonado-Jáquez J. La organización y agrupación como eje toral para el diseño de esquemas de atención a caprinocultores en el norte de México: Estudio de caso. Abanico Vet. 2020; 10:1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.21929/abavet2020.13
  21. Maldonado-Jáquez JA, Granados-Rivera LD, Hernández-Mendo O, Pastor-López FJ, Isidro-Requejo LM, Maconetzin L, Salinas-González H, Torres-Hernández G. Uso de un alimento integral como complemento a cabras locales en pastoreo: respuesta en producción y composición química de la leche. Nova Scientia. 2017; 9(1):55-75. doi:10.21640/ns.v9i18.728
  22. Otaru SM, Adamu AM, Ehoche OW. Influence of levels of supplementary concentrate mixture on lactation performance of Red Sokoto does and the pre-weaning growth rate of their kids. Vet Anim Sci. 2020; 10:100137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2020.100137
  23. Bushara I, Godah FGI. Effect of supplementary feeding with residual of sesame capsule to lactating desert goat during dry period in North Kordofan State, Sudan. Adv Biol Earth Sci. 2018; 3(1):47-59. http://jomardpublishing.com/UploadFiles/Files/journals/ABES/V3N1/BusharaI.pdf
  24. Granados-Rivera LD, Hernández-Mendo O, Maldonado-Jáquez JA. Energy balance in lactating goats: Response to mixture of conjugated linoleic acid. Animal Science Journal. 2020; 91:e13347. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13347
  25. Acero-Plazas VM. El bienestar animal en sistemas productivos de ovinos-caprinos en Colombia. Spei Domus. 2014; 10(20):57-62. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.16925/sp.v10i21.918
  26. Zambom MA, Alcalde CR, Gomes LC, de Oliveira REC, Rossi RM, da Silva KDC. Effect of soybean hulls on lactation curves and the composition of goat milk. Rev Bras Zoot. 2017; 48(2):167-173. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902017000200012
  27. Espinoza GJA, Vélez IA, Góngora GSF, Cuevas RV, Vázquez GR, Rivera MJA. Evaluación del impacto en la productividad y rentabilidad de la tecnología transferida al sistema de bovinos de doble propósito del trópico mexicano. Trop Subtrop Agroec. 2018; 21:261-272. https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/2411
  28. Walters JP, Archer DW, Sassenrath GF, Hendrickson JR, Hanson JD, Halloran JM, Vadas P, Alarcon VJ. Exploring agricultural production systems and their fundamental components with system dynamics modelling. Ecol Mod. 2016; 333:51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.04.015
  29. Browning Jr. R, Leite-Browning ML. Comparison of productivity of different breeds of meat goats under low-to-moderate-input systems in the United States. Prof Agric Workers J. 2021; 6(3):19-32. https://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj/vol6/iss3/5
  30. Estevane HE, Alvarado MLF. Critica a la metodología del extensionismo oficial: cambiar el sistema de manejo de pastoreo a semiestabulado en el ganado caprino lechero. Rev Mex Agroneg. 2020; 46:430-443. http://www.somexaa.com/ejemplares.html
  31. Mayberry D, Ash A, Prestwidge D, Herrero M. Closing yield gaps in smallholder goat production systems in Ethiopia and India. Livest Sci. 2018; 214:238-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.015
  32. Gómez OLM, Posada OSL, Olivera ÁM, Rosero NR, Aguirre MP. Análisis de rentabilidad de la producción de leche de acuerdo con la variación de la fuente de carbohidrato utilizada en el suplemento de vacas Holstein. Rev Med Vet. 2017; 34(1):9-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.19052/mv.4251
  33. McGregor BA. The effects of nutrition and parity on the development and productivity of Angora goats: 1. Manipulation of mid pregnancy nutrition on energy intake and maintenance requirement, kid birth weight, kid survival, doe live weight and mohair production. Small Rum Res. 2016; 145:65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.027
  34. Santos-Lavalle R, Salas-González JM, Sagarnaga-Villegas LM, Cervantes-Escoto F, Barrera-Perales OT. Producción intensiva de leche caprina en Guanajuato, México: análisis de costos y viabilidad económica. Custos e @Agronegócio. 2020; 16(2):418-440. http://www.custoseagronegocioonline.com.br/numero2v16/OK%2019%20leche.pdf
  35. Rebollar-Rebollar S, Hernández-Martínez J, Rojo-Rubio R, Guzmán-Soria E. Gastos e ingresos en la actividad caprina extensiva en México. Agron Mesoam. 2012; 23(1):159-165. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v23i1.6414
  36. Ratnawati D, Cowley F, Mayberry D, Pamungkas D, Poppi D. Concentrate supplementation for crossbred bulls to increase profitability of smallholders fattening operations in East Java, Indonesia. Indonesian J Anim Vet Sci. 2015; 20(1):41-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v20i1.1115

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |