Relaciones entre peso, condición corporal y producción de leche en vacas del sistema doble propósito

Relaciones entre peso, condición corporal y producción de leche en vacas del sistema doble propósito

Published 2008-05-01

Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
How to Cite
Salgado O., R., Vergara G., O., & Simanca S., J. (2008). Relaciones entre peso, condición corporal y producción de leche en vacas del sistema doble propósito. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.395
doi

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.395
Dimensions
PlumX
Roger Salgado O.
Oscar Vergara G.
Juan Simanca S.
Show authors biography

Roger Salgado O.

Universidad de Córdoba, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias. Montería, Colombia

Oscar Vergara G.

Universidad de Córdoba, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Ciencias Pecuarias. Montería, Colombia

Juan Simanca S.

Ejercicio particular
Objetivo. Evaluar las relaciones entre peso corporal, condición corporal y producción de leche en respuesta a la suplementación con semilla de algodón. Materiales y métodos. Se utilizaron 13 vacas y se conformaron dos grupos de tratamientos utilizando un diseño al azar: G1 (n=7) vacas suplementadas con 2 kg. de semilla de algodón; G2 (n=6) vacas no suplementadas. Para el análisis de resultados se emplearon correlaciones de Spearman. Resultados. Se presentaron correlaciones positivas entre la variación de peso corporal y condición corporal (p0.05) en las vacas suplementadas; por el contrario se presentaron correlaciones positivas (p0.05). Conclusiones. La suplementación con semilla de algodón presentó relaciones positivas importantes entre la variación del peso, condición corporal y producción de leche en vacas de primer parto manejadas bajo condiciones de pastoreo.

Article visits 2379 | PDF visits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Waltner S, McNamara J, Hillers J. Relationships of body condition score to production variables in high production Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76: 3410-3419. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77679-1
  3. Wildman E, Jones G, Wagner P, Bowman R. Dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics. J Dairy Sci 1982; 65: 495-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82223-6
  5. Butler W, Smith R. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 767-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79169-4
  7. Domecq J, Skidmore A, Lloyd J, Kaneene J. Relationship between body condition scores and conception at first artificial insemination in a large dairy herd of high yielding Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1997a; 80: 113-120.
  9. Domecq J, Skidmore A, Lloyd J, Kaneene J. Relationship between body condition scores and milk yield in a large dairy herd of high yielding Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1997b; 80: 101-112.
  11. Enevoldsen C, Kristensen T. Estimation of body weight from body size measurements and BCS in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1988-1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76142-3
  13. Koenen E, Groen A, Gengler N. Phenotypic variation in live weight and live-weight changes of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. J Anim Sci 1999; 68: 109-114.
  15. Tveit B, Svendsen M, Hove K. Heritability of hypocalcemia at first parturition in Norwegian cattle: Genetic correlations with yield and weight. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3561-3567. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78548-2
  17. Ahlborn G , Demp fle L . Genetic parameters for milk production and body size in New Zealand HolsteinFriesian and Jersey. Livest Prod Sci 1992; 31: 205-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(92)90018-Y
  19. Veerkamp R and Brotherstone S. Genetic correlations between linear type traits, food intake, live weight and condition score in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. J Anim Sci 1997; 64: 385-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800015976
  21. Dechow C, Rogers G, Clay J. Heritabilities and correlations among body condition scores, production traits, and reproductive performance. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 266-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74476-1
  23. Veerkamp R, Koenen E, De Jong G. Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in 1st parity cows estimated by random regression models. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 2327-2335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74681-4
  25. Edmondson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaber CO, Farber T, Webster GA. Body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0
  27. Gallo L, Carnier P, Cassandro M, Mantovani R, Bailoni L, Contiero B, Biltante G. Change in Body Condition Score of Holstein Cows as Affected by Parity and Mature Equivalent Milk Yield. J Dairy Sci 1996; 79: 1004-1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76452-4
  29. Maza L, Salgado R, Vergara O. Efecto de la condición corporal al parto sobre el comportamiento reproductivo y variación de peso corporal post-parto de vacas mestizas lecheras. Rev MVZ Córdoba 2000; 6(1): 75-80.
  31. Cavestany D, Blanc J, Kulcsar M, Uriarte G, Chilibroste P, Meikle A, Febel H, Ferraris A, Krall E. Studies of the Transition Cow Under a Pasture-based Milk Production System: Metabolic Profiles. J Vet Med 2005; 52: 1-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2004.00679.x
  33. Gearhart M, Curtis C, Erb H, Smith R, Sniffen C, Chase L, Cooper M. Relationship of changes in condition score to cow healt in Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 1990; 73: 3132-3140. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)79002-9
  35. Nebel R, McGilliard M. Interactions of high milk yield and reproductive performance in dairy cows. J Anim Sci 1993; 76: 3257-3268. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(93)77662-6
  37. Garnsworthy P, Toops J. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Anim Prod 1982; 35: 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000335610000088X http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100000878
  39. Bauman D, Currie W. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review fof mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. J Dairy Sci 1980; 63: 1514-1529. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83111-0
  41. Edmonson A, Lean J, Weaver D, Farver, T, Webster G. A body condition scoring chart0 for Holstein dairy cow. J Dairy Sci 1989. 72: 68-78.
  43. Van Arendonk, Nieuwhof G, Vos H, Korver S. Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livest Prod Sci 1991; 29: 263-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(91)90103-W
  45. Ceballos A, Gómez P, Vélez M, Villa N, López L. Variación de los indicadores bioquímicos del balance de energía según el estado productivo en bovinos lecheros de Manizales, Colombia. Rev Col Cienc Pec 2001; 15(1): 13-25.
  47. Rukkwamsuk T, Kruip T, Meijer G, Wen sing T. Hepa ti c fa t ty a cid composition in periparturient dairy cows with fatty liver induced by intake of a high energy diet in the dry period. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82: 280-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75234-3

Information

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

0.6
2020CiteScore
 
 
28th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Redib Widget
Tutorials

Autors:

How send article?

Evaluator pair

How to evaluate an article?

Keywords

QR code

Current Issue

Perfil de Google Scholar

Most read in the last 30 days

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |