Relación hospedero-parásito Trypanosoma cruzi

Relación hospedero-parásito Trypanosoma cruzi

Published 2000-01-05

Open | Download
PDF (Spanish) FLIP
How to Cite
Palau, M. T. (2000). Relación hospedero-parásito Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.538
doi

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.538
Dimensions
PlumX
María Teresa Palau
Show authors biography

María Teresa Palau

INS Grupo de Parasitología Bogotá, DC. Colombia
Cuando hablamos de la relación hospedero - parásito es necesario remitirnos a la concepción de un abordaje tipo asociación de dos protagonistas que desempeñan funciones activas y fundamentales. Existen muchas interacciones parásito - hospedero las cuales son particulares dependiendo del parásito involucrado. Los parásitos protozooss afectan la red inmunológica del hospedero, generando un desequilibrio a su favor, induciendo una respuesta insuficiente o inespecífica. Sin embargo, para cada parásito existe una serie de mecanismos efectores que llevan a desplazar la respuesta a favor del hospedero y son esos mecanismos los que precisamente deben ser conocidos y estudiados para tratar de eliminar los parásitos patógenos.

Article visits 2930 | PDF visits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Abrahamsohn lA., and Coffman R. (1996): Trypanosoma cruzi: IL-1O, TNF, IFN gamma, and IL-12 Regulate Innate and Acquired Immunity to Infection. Experimental Parasitology 84:231-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/expr.1996.0109
  3. Ayala FJ. (1993): Trypanosoma and Leishmania have clonal population structure of epidemiological significance. Biol Res 26:47-63.
  5. Bogdan C., and Rollinghoff M. (1999): How do Protozoan Parasites Survive inside Macrophages?. ParasitologyToday, 15(1): 22-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0169-4758(98)01362-3
  7. Clark lA., and Rockett K. (1996): Nitric Oxide and Parasitic Disease. Advances in Parasitology Vol. 37 pp.1 -35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60218-3
  9. Cremona ML., Pollevick GD., Frasch AC., and Campetella O. (1996): Effect of primary structure modifications in Trypanosoma cruzi neuraminidasa/ transsialidase activities. CeIl Mol Biol 42(5):697-702.
  11. Fernández M., Mu-oz-Fernández MA., y Fresno M. (1993): Mecanismos de Evasión Inmune por Protozoos Parásitos. En: Parasitología Molecular pp.247- 285 SCIC -UAM, Madrid-Espa-a.
  13. Heise N., Raper J., Buxbaum LU., Peranovich TM., and De Almeida ML. (1996): Identification of complete precursors for the glycosilphosphatidylinositol protein anchors of Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Biol Chem 271 (28):16877-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.28.16877
  15. Hontebeyrie-Joskowicz M. (1990): Murine Trypanosoma cruzi infection: a role for TH2 celis in the immunopathology of chronic infection. Inmune Response in Chagas Disease pp.141-143.
  17. Kahn BS.,Wleklinski M.,AruffoA., Farr A., Coder D., and Kahn M. (1995): Trypanosoma cruzi amastigote adhesion to macrophages is facilitated by mannose receptor. J. Exp Med 182:1243-1258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.182.5.1243
  19. Laucella S., De Titto EH., Segura EI., Orn A., and Rottenberg ME. (1996): Soluble cell adhesion molecules in human Chagas disease: association with disease severity stage of infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 55(6)629-634
  21. Mauel Jacques (1996): Intracellular Survival of Protozoan Parasites with Special Reference to Leishmania spp., Toxoplasma gondii and Trypanosoma cruzi. Advances in Parasitology Vol 38 pp. 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60032-9
  23. MckerrowJH., Sun E and Rosenthal PJ., and Bouvier J. (1993): The Proteases and Pathogenicity of Parasitic Protozoa. Annu.Rev. Microbiol. 47:821 -853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.004133
  25. Rosenthal PJ. (1999): Proteases of Protozoan Parasites. Advances in Parasitology. Vol 43 pp. 105-159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60242-0
  27. Ruiz PC., Favoreto S Jr., Dorta ML Oshiro MEM.,. Ferreira AT., Manque PM., and Yoshida N. (1998): lnfectivity of Trypanosorna cruzi strains is associated with differential expression of surface glycoproteins with differential Ca+ signalling activity. 330:505-511
  29. SavilI John. (1997): Apoptosis in resolution of inflammation. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 61:375-380.
  31. Serveau C., Lalmanach G., Hirata I., Scharfstein J., Juliano MA., and Gauthier F (1999): Discrimination of cruzipain, the major cysteine proteinase of Trypanosoma cruzi, and mammalian cathepsins B and L, by a pH inducible fluorogenic substrate of trypanosomal cysteine proteinases. Eur J Biochem 259(1-2):275-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00032.x
  33. Souto PR., Fernández O., Macedo AM., Campbell DA., and Zingales B. (1996): DNA markers define two major phylogenetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 83:141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(96)02755-7
  35. Tibayrenc M., Kjellberg F., Arnaud J., Oury B., Breniere SF., Darde M-L and Ayala FJ. (1991): Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A population genetics vantage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:5129-5133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.12.5129
  37. Yoshida N., Dorta ML., Ferreira AT., Oshiro ME., Mortara RA., Acosta-Serrano A., and Favoreto Junior S. (1997): Removal of sialic acid from mucin-like surface molecules of Trypanosoma cruzi metacyclic trypomastigotes enhances parasite-host cell interaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol 84(1):57-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-6851(96)02783-1

Information

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

0.6
2020CiteScore
 
 
28th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Redib Widget
Tutorials

Autors:

How send article?

Evaluator pair

How to evaluate an article?

Keywords

QR code

Current Issue

Perfil de Google Scholar

Most read in the last 30 days

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |