Influence of subclinical infection by agents of tick fever in milking dairy cows

Influencia de la infección subclínica por agentes de la fiebre por garrapatas en vacas lecheras

ABSTRACT

Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of subclinical infection by agents of tick fever in dairy cattle on milk parameters, such as production, composition, and quality. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in a private farm with 75 free-stall-housed dairy cows, from which 37 were evaluated. Monthly, individual milk samples were collected for compositional (fat, lactose, protein, and total solids) and quality (somatic cell counts (SCC)) analyses. In addition, blood samples were collected in order to identify cows that were tick fever-negative and positive by PCR for one or more of the following etiological agents: Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina and Anaplasma marginale. Results. The results showed increased SCC in positive animals for at least one of the agents when compared to non-infected cows (p<0.05). Milk production was significantly lower in A. marginale positive animals (p<0.05). An increase of about 40% in milk solids content was found in B. bovis positive cows. Also, an increment of approximately 23% in lactose was found on cows positives for B. bigemina. Conclusions. We may conclude that the presence of at least one of these parasites in dairy cattle affects composition or quality of their milk.

1. Monteiro SG. Parasitologia Veterinária. São Paulo Brazil: Roca; 2010.
3. Almeida MB, Tortelli FP, Riet-Correa B, Ferreira JLM, Soares MP, Farias NAR, Riet- Correa F, Schild AL. Tick fever in southern Brazil: a retrospective study of 1978- Tick fever in southern Brazil: a retrospective study of 1978-2005. Pesqui Vet Bras 2006; 26(4):236-242.
5. Gonçalves RC, da Silva AA, Ferreira DOL, Chiacchio SB, Lopes RS, Borges AS, Amorim RA. Tristeza Parasitária em bovinos na região de Botucatu – SP: estudo retrospectivo de 1986 – 2007. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 2011; 32(1):307-312.
6. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n1p307
8. Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Blouin EF, Coetzee JF, Ewing SA. The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Vet Parasitol 2010; 167(1):95-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.012
10. Leitner G, Merin U, Silanikove N, Ezra E, Chaffer M, Gollop N, Winkler M, Glickman A, Saran A. Effect of subclinical intramammary infection on somatic cell counts, NAGase activity and gross composition of goats milk. J Dairy Res 2005; 71(3):311-315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029904000305
12. Ruegg PL, Pantoja JCF. Understanding and using somatic cell counts to improve milk quality. Irish J Agric Food Res 2013; 52(2):101–117.
14. Beaudeau F, Fourichon C, Robert A, Joly A, Seegers H. Bulk milk somatic cell counts and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) infection in dairy herds in Brittany (western France). Prev Vet Med 2005; 72(1-2):163-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.08.017
16. Laureyns J, Piepers S, Ribbens S, Sarrazin S, De Vliegher S, Van Crombrugge JM, Dewulf J. Association between herd exposure to BVDV-infection and bulk milk somatic cell count of Flemish dairy farms. Prev Vet Med 2013; 109(1-2):148-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.09.013
18. Suarez CE, Palmer CH, Jasmer DP. Characterization of the gene enconding a 60-kilodalton Babesia bovis merozoite protein with conserved and surface exposed epitopes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 1991; 46(1):45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(91)90197-E
20. Figueroa JV, Chieves LP, Jonhson GS, Buening GM. Detection of Babesia bigemina – infected carriers by polymerase chain reaction amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30(10):2576-2582.
22. Lew AE, Bock RE, Minchin CM, Masaka S. A msp1alpha polymerase chain reaction assay for specific detection and differentiation of Anaplasma marginale isolates. Vet Microbiol 2002; 86(4):325-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00017-2
24. Cremonesi P, Capoferri R, Pisoni G, Del Corvo M, Strozzi F, Rupp R, Caillat H, Modesto P, Moroni P, Williams JL, Castiglioni B, Stella A. Response of the goat mammary gland to infection with Staphylococcus aureus revealed by gene expression profiling in milk somatic and white blood cells. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:540.
25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-540
27. Brenaut P, Lefèvre L, Rau A, Laloë D, Pisoni G, Moroni P, Bevilacqua C, Martin P. Contribution of mammary epithelial cells to the immune response during early stages of a bacterial infection to Staphylococcus aureus. Vet Res 2014; 45:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-45-16
29. Malek dos Reis CB, Barreiro JR, Mestieri L, Porcionato MA, dos Santos MV. Effect of somatic cell count and mastitis pathogens on milk composition in Gyr cows. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9:67.
30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-67
32. Spaniol JS, Oltramari CE, Locatelli M., Volpato A, Campigotto G, Stefani SM, Da Silva AS. Influence of probiotic on somatic cell count in milk and immune system of dairy cows. Comp Clin Path 2015; 24(3):677-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-014-1966-y
34. Anziani OA, Hadani A, Ford CA, Guglielmone AA, Bermúdez AC, Mangold AJ, Suárez CM, Tarabla DH. Observaciones de campo y laboratorio sobre la inoculación de bovinos Holando Argentino con una cepa de Anaplasma marginale. Gac Vet 1981; 43(366):962-974.
36. Kocan KM, de la Fuente J, Guglielmone AA, Meléndez RD. Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 16(4):698-712.
37. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.4.698-712.2003
39. Stuen S, Solli Oppegaard A, Bergström K, Moum T. Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection in North Norway. The First Laboratory Confirmed Case. Acta Vet Scand 2005; 46(1):167-171. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-46-167