Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Effectiveness of predictive factors of canine intubation

Efectividad de factores predictivos de intubación en caninos



Open | Download

How to Cite
Molina D, V., & García G, J. (2017). Effectiveness of predictive factors of canine intubation. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 22(1), 5683-5693. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.928

Dimensions
PlumX
Víctor Molina D
José García G

Objetive. To determine predictors of effectiveness of airway intubation and its prognostic value, according to the morphology of the skull in dogs. Materials and methods. We performed a descriptive, observational study in two veterinary clinics, in Medellin city, Colombia. 74 dogs were evaluated randomly. All underwent Mallampati, Patil-Aldreti, Cormack-Lehane scale and distance sternum chin separated by skull morphology. Tukey test p≤0.05 were performed in skull morphology and predictive scales; in addition to principal component analysis and predictive scale race. Results. significant statistics and Mallampati between brachycephalic, dolichocephalic and mesocephalic (p=0.00), brachycephalic had difficult intubation, Cormack-Lehane differences were presented also similar between brachycephalic and the other two groups. Exhibited brachycephalic difficult intubation. Patil-Aldreti revealed brachycephalic demonstrate statistical difference from the others, with moderate difficulty. The sternum chin distance, showed no divergence for any of the three groups. Assessment predictor of intubation found that 13.51 % of dogs have difficult intubation, 37.83 % with moderate difficulty and 47.29 % showed slight difficulty for intubation. The average intubation attempts was 1.83 attempts and the average time was 123.43 sec. The main components determined that breeds Bulldog, is predicted by Mallampati and Patil-Aldreti while Pinscher is predicted by Cormack Lehane. Mixed races, is not influenced by a predictor. Conclusions. Brachycephalic type canines are those with greater difficulty of intubation and Mallampati is the main predictor factor.


Article visits 1517 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Vesal N, Nikahval B, Sarchahi A. An unusual complication of endotracheal intubation in a dog. Vet Anaesth Analg 2013; 40(6):650-659.
  2. Sanchis Mora S, Seymour C. An unusual complication of endotracheal intubation. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011; 38(2):158-159.
  3. ASA. Task Force on management of the difficult airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 78:597-602.
  4. ASA. Task Force on Management of the Diffi cult Airway: Practice guidelines for management of the diffi cult airway, an updated report. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:1269-1277.
  5. ASA. Mallampati Classification, an Estimate of Upper Airway Anatomical Balance, Can Change Rapidly during Labor. Anesthesiology 2008; 108(3):347-349.
  6. Pérez-Santos F, Hernández M, Díaz-Landeira J, Santana M, Domínguez J, Herrera M. Efectividad del uso de predictores de vía aérea difícil en el área de urgencias. Emergencias 2011; 23(4):293-298.
  7. Orozco-Díaz E, Álvarez-Ríos J, Arcero-Díaz J, Ornelas-Aguirre J. Predicción de intubación difícil mediante escalas de valoración de la vía aérea. Cir Cir 2010; 78(5):393-399.
  8. Arzate Alcántara F, Flores López D, Dosta Herrera J, Cruz Rodríguez M, Callejas Alvárez J. Evaluación de la vía Aérea Difícil según la escala de Intubación Difícil (IDS). Educ E Investig Clínica 2001; 2:26-34.
  9. Escobar D. ¿Cuánto Podemos Predecir la Vía Aérea Difícil? Rev Chil Anest 2009; 38:84-90.
  10. Adamus M, Fristscherova S, Hrabalek L, Gabrhelik T, Zapletalova J, Janout V. Mallampati Test as a Predictor of Laryngoscopic View. Biomed Pap 2010; 154(4):339-44.
  11. Suk-Hwan S, Jeong-Gill L, Soo-Bong Y, Doo-Sik K, Sie-Jeong R, Kyung-Han K. Predictors of difficult intubation defined by the intubation difficulty scale (IDS): predictive value of 7 airway assessment factors. Korean J Anesth 2012; 63(2):491-497.
  12. Benumof J, Cormack R, Lehané J. Difficult tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1984; 39(11):1105-1113.
  13. Benumof J, White P. The laringeal mask airway: Indications and contraindications. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77(5):843-849.
  14. Langeron O, Cuvillon P, Ibañez-Estevez C, Lenfant F, Riou B, LeManach Y. Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation Time for a Paradigm Change. Anesthesiology 2012; 117(12):1223-1233.
  15. Mallampati S, Gatt S. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anesth Soc J 1985; 32(4):429-434.
  16. Cormack R, Lehané J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39(11):1105-1111.
  17. Grünberg G, Bounous A, Prestes I, Guzmán A, Illescas L, Ferreira E, et al. Evaluación de los Métodos Predictores de Vía Aérea Dificultosa en Pacientes Coordinados para Procedimientos Endoscópicos de Vía Aérea Superior. Anesth Analg 2006; 21(1):1-10.
  18. Lynn Elis J, Thomason J, Kebreab E, Zubair K, France J. Cranial dimensions and forces of biting in the domestic dog. J Anat 2009; 214(3):362-373.
  19. Gupta S, Sharma R, Jain D. Airway Assessment: Predictors of Difficult Airway. Indian J Anaest 2005; 49(4):257-262.
  20. Friedman M, Hamilton C, Samuelson C, Lundgren M, Pott T. Diagnostic Value of the Friedman Tongue Position and Mallampati Classification for Obstructive Sleep Apnea A Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148(4):540-7.
  21. Ríos García E, Reyes Cedeño J. Valor predictivo de las evaluaciones de la vía aérea difícil. Trauma 2005; 8(3):63-70.
  22. Torres Salas A, Dosta Herrera J, Flores López D. Distancia Mandíbulo-Hioidea Como Factor Para Determinar Intubación Orotraqueal Difícil. Rev Anest Mex 1998; 10(2):121-125.
  23. Fowler R, Pearl R. The airway: emergent management for nonanesthesiologists. WestJMed 2002; 176(1):45-50.
  24. Huang H, Lee M, Shih Y, Chu H, Huang T, Hsieh T. Modified mallampati classification as a clinical predictor of peroral esophagogastroduodenoscopy tolerance. BMC Gastron 2011; 11(12):1-7.
  25. Khan Z, khorasani A, Yekaninejad M. Mallampati Airway Assessment Test in Upright and Supine Positions with and without Noisy Exhalation in the Prediction of Difficult Mask Ventilation. Intern Med 2013; 3(1):122-127.
  26. Orozco S, Gómez L. Manejo médico y quirúrgico del síndrome de las vías aéreas superiores del braquicéfalo. Reporte de un caso. RCCP 2003; 16(2):162-170.
  27. Colak A, Yilmaz A, Memis D, Süt N, Sabri Cigali B, Kargi M, et al. What can Anthropometric Measurements Tell us About Mallampati Classification?. Balk Med J 2012; 29:68-72.
  28. Griego PJ, Morillo A, Mejía H, Echeverry G, Ruíz J. Intubación Difícil: Valoración de Métodos clínicos y Radiológicos para su Detención. Rev Col Anest 1990; 18(27):27-39.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |