Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Protein fragment intake and digestibility of protein in diets supplied to Chino Santandereano cattle

Consumo de fragmentos proteicos y digestibilidad de proteína en dietas suministradas a bovinos Chino Santandereano



How to Cite
Contreras-Marquez, D. E., Quintero-Pardo, J. S., Correa-Rojas, E. D., Canchila-Asencio, E. R., & Gutiérrez-Zocadagui, H. Y. (2020). Protein fragment intake and digestibility of protein in diets supplied to Chino Santandereano cattle. Journal MVZ Cordoba, 25(3), e1876. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1876

Dimensions
PlumX
David Esteban Contreras-Marquez
Juan Sebastian Quintero-Pardo
Edwin Davier Correa-Rojas
Emiro Rafael Canchila-Asencio
Heidy Yeritza Gutiérrez-Zocadagui

Objective. To quantify the concentration and consumption of the protein fragments (NPN, TP, RDTP, SDTP, NDIP, and ADIP) present in the diet supplied to cattle, and its effect on the digestibility of crude protein. Materials and methods. Diets offered to Chino Santandereano cattle in stables, receiving different levels of supplementation, were analyzed. Using four animals in the 4x4 Latin square design, the treatments were UNS, not supplemented; LOW, supplemented with an amount relative to 0.5% of body weight; MEDIUM, supplemented with an amount relative to 1.0% of body weight; HIGH, supplemented with an amount relative to 1.5% of body weight. Consumption was determined daily, and digestibility through total stool collection in the last two days of each period. Results. A higher concentration of crude protein was found in the supplement than in grass (p<0.001), the forage exhibiting a higher concentration of CPNPN (p<0.001). The supplement also presented a higher concentration of TP (p<0.001) and RDTP (p=0.027). Supplemented animals presented higher consumption of CP, CPNPN (p=0.037), TP, NDIP, RDTP, ADIP, and SDTP (p<0.05), however, when the concentration representing the consumption of ADIP in the consumption of CP was determined, no difference was observed between supplemented and UNS (p=0.078). Higher digestibility of CP was found in supplemented animals than in UNS (p<0.001), and an upward linear effect was observed between supplemented treatments as the level of supplementation increased. Conclusions. Supplementation improves the digestibility of crude protein by providing a greater amount of highly digestible nitrogenous fragments.


Article visits 1419 | PDF visits


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  1. Batista ED, Detmann E, Titgemeyer EC, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Prates LL, et al. Effects of varying ruminally undegradable protein supplementation on forage digestion, nitrogen metabolism, and urea kinetics in Nellore cattle fed low-quality tropical forage. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(1):201–216. http://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9493
  2. Licitra G, Hernandez TM, van Soest PJ. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1996; 57(4):347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
  3. Sniffen CJ, O’Connor JD, van Soest PJ, Fox DG, Russell JB. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J Anim Sci. 1992; 70(11):3562–3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
  4. Sampaio CB, Detmann E, Paulino MF, Valadares Filho SC, de Souza MA, Lazzarini I, et al. Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010; 42(7):1471–1479. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9581-7
  5. Marquez DC, Paulino MF, Rennó LN, Villadiego FC, Ortega RM, Moreno DS, et al. Supplementation of grazing beef cows during gestation as a strategy to improve skeletal muscle development of the offspring. Animal. 2017; 11(1):2184-2192. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000982
  6. Contreras Marquez DE, Fonseca Paulino M, Mageste de Almeida D, Masa Ortega RE, Soares Martins L, Sotelo Moreno DP, et al. Metabolism prepartum and reproductive responses postpartum of Nellore cows supplemented in different periods of gestation. CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. 2019; 14(1):25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.14.1.3
  7. Sotelo D, Paulino MF, Rennó LN, Detmann E, Ortega RM, Marquez DC, et al. Performance and metabolic status of grazing beef heifers receiving increasing protein supplementation pre- and postpartum. Anim Prod Sci. 2019; 59(7):1244-1252. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17485
  8. Lazzarini I, Detmann E, Sampaio CB, Paulino MF, Valadares Filho S de C, Souza MA, et al. Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Rev Bras Zoot. 2009; 38(10):2021–2030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001000024
  9. Marquez DEC, Fonseca Paulino M, Marcondes MI, Navajas Rennó L, Vieira de Barros L, Soares Martins L, et al. Nutritional parameters and production of calves on pasture supplemented with different sources of protein foods. Sem: Cienc Agrar. 2014; 35(5):2709–2722. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n5p2709
  10. Detmann E, Souza MA de, Valadares Filho S de C, Queiroz AC, Berchielli TT, Saliba E de OS, et al. Métodos para análise de alimentos. Visconde do Rio Branco: Suprema. 2012; 1:1–214. https://www.editoraufv.com.br/produto/metodos-para-analise-de-alimentos/1109316
  11. de Almeida D, Marcondes M, Rennó L, Pereira SL, Martins L, Marquez D, et al. Nutritional planning for Nellore heifers post-weaning to conception at 15 months of age: performance and nutritional, metabolic, and reproductive responses. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019; 51(1):79-87. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1662-z
  12. Martins LS, Paulino MF, Marcondes MI, Rennó LN, de Almeida DM, Lopes SA, et al. Cottonseed meal is a suitable replacement for soybean meal in supplements fed to Nellore heifers grazing Brachiaria decumbens. Anim Prod Sci. 2017; 57(9):1893-1898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN15709
  13. Detmann E, Valente ÉEL, Batista ED, Huhtanen P. An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation. Livest Sci. 2014 162:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.01.029
  14. Gaviria X, Rivera J, Barahona R. Nutritional quality and fractionation of carbohydrates and protein in the forage components of an intensive silvopastoral system. Pastures and Forages. 2015; 38(2):194-201. https://payfo.ihatuey.cu/index.php?journal=pasto&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=1838
  15. Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen PH. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015; 5(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |