Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Determination of microbiological and sensory parameters of fish fillets with propolis preserved under refrigeration

Determination of microbiological and sensory parameters of fish fillets with propolis preserved under refrigeration



Abrir | Descargar

Cómo citar
Suarez M, H., Jiménez T, Álvaro, & Díaz M, C. (2014). Determination of microbiological and sensory parameters of fish fillets with propolis preserved under refrigeration. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 19(3), 4214-4225. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.84

Dimensions
PlumX
Héctor Suarez M
Álvaro Jiménez T
Consuelo Díaz M

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the ability of propolis preservative cachama fillets during refrigerated storage. Materials and method. Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) were used in cachama fillets. The treatments included: i) 96% ethanol alcohol as the control; ii) 0.8% EEP; iii) 1.2% EEP; and iv) liquid smoke. A in vitro analysis was used to determine the inhibitory effect of propolis on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Clostridium sp. and on the fish matrix to determine the mesophiles, psychrotrophiles, total coliforms, fecal coliforms, sulphite reducing spores and the presence of Salmonella. Results. The results of the in vitro analysis demonstrated the control that the EEP had over the evaluated microorganisms without presenting significant differences between the different concentrations (p>0.05). The analyses of the fish fillet matrix presented acceptable contents for the evaluated microorganisms in the treatments with EEP. A different situation was seen in the treatment with liquid smoke and the control, which had samples that where rejected after 20 days of storage. The sensory analysis showed acceptance for the samples with EEP until the end of the storage period but low marks for the treatment with liquid smoke and the control. Conclusions. The EEP used in this study could be effective for the control of Gram positive bacteria and some Gram negative bacteria that are present in cachama fillets; and could be an alternative to the use of chemical preservatives.


Visitas del artículo 913 | Visitas PDF


Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.
  1. Popova M, P., Bankova V, S., Bogdanov S, Tsvetkova I, Naydenski C, Marcazzan G, Luigi, et al. Chemical characteristics of poplar type propolis of different geographic origin. Apidologie 2007;38(3):306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2007013
  2. Bankova V. Recent trends and important developments in propolis research. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2005;2(1):29-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh059
  3. Castaldo S, Capasso F. Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia 2002;73:S1-S6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00185-5
  4. Silici S, Kutluca S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propolis collected by three different races of honeybees in the same region. J Ethnopharmacol 2005;99(1):69-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.046
  5. Drago L, De Vecchi E, Nicola L, Gismondo M. In vitro antimicrobial activity of a novel propolis formulation (Actichelated propolis). J Appl Microbiol 2007;103(5):1914-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03421.x
  6. Sawaya AC, Souza KS, Marcucci MC, Cunha I, Shimizu MT. Analysis of the composition of Brazilian propolis extracts by chromatography and evaluation of their In vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria. Braz J Microbiol 2004;35(1-2):104-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822004000100017
  7. Erkmen O, Özcan MM. Antimicrobial effects of Turkish propolis, pollen, and laurel on spoilage and pathogenic food-related microorganisms. J Med Food 2008;11(3):587-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2007.0038
  8. Cho J, Kim Y, Kwon M. Antibacterial effects of propolis extracts on pathogenic bacteria. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 2005(15:4):57-64.
  9. Tosi EA, Ré E, Ortega ME, Cazzoli AF. Food preservative based on propolis: Bacteriostatic activity of propolis polyphenols and flavonoids. Food Chem 2007;104(3):1025-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.011
  10. Mascheroni E, Guillard V, Nalin F, Mora L, Piergiovanni L. Diffusivity of propolis compounds in Polylactic acid polymer for the development of anti-microbial packaging films. J Food Eng 2010;98(3):294-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.12.028
  11. Kalogeropoulos N, Konteles SJ, Troullidou E, Mourtzinos I, Karathanos VT. Chemical composition, antioxidant activity and antimicrobial properties of propolis extracts from Greece and Cyprus. Food Chem 2009;116(2):452-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.060
  12. Certificación ICdNTy. Norma técnica Colombiana NTC 1443. Productos de la pesca y acuicultura. Pescado entero, medallones y trozos, refrigerados o congelados. 2009.
  13. Certificación ICdNTy. Norma Técnica Colombiana. NTC 1325. Industrias alimentarias. Productos cárnicos procesados no enlatados. Icontec Bogotá D.C; 2008.
  14. Chaillou LL, Nazareno MA. Bioactivity of propolis from Santiago del Estero, Argentina, related to their chemical composition. Lebenson Wiss Technol. 2009;42(8):1422-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2009.03.002
  15. Mohammadzadeh S, Shariatpanahi M, Hamedi M, Ahmadkhaniha R, Samadi N, Ostad SN. Chemical composition, oral toxicity and antimicrobial activity of Iranian propolis. Food Chem 2007;103(4):1097-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.006
  16. Palomino García LR, Martínez Galán JP, García Pajón CM, Gil González JH, Durango Restrepo DL. Caracterización fisicoquímica y actividad antimicrobiana del propóleos en el Municipio de la Unión (Antioquia, Colombia). Rev Fac Nal Agr Medellín 2010; 63(1):5373-83.
  17. Brehm-Stecher B, Johnson E. Sensitization of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli to antibiotics by the sesquiterpenoids nerodiol, farnesol, bisabolol and apritone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47(10):3357-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.10.3357-3360.2003
  18. Kim Y-H, Chung H-J. The effects of Korean propolis against foodborne pathogens and transmission electron microscopic examination. N Biotechnol 2011;28(6):713-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2010.12.006
  19. Melliou E, Stratis E, Chinou I. Volatile constituents of propolis from various regions of Greece–Antimicrobial activity. Food Chem 2007;103(2):375-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.033
  20. Boyanova L, Kolarov R, Gergova G, Mitov I. In vitro activity of Bulgarian propolis against 94 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobe 2006;12(4):173-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.06.001
  21. Da Silva JFM, De Souza MC, Matta SR, De Andrade MR, Vidal FVN. Correlation analysis between phenolic levels of Brazilian propolis extracts and their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Food Chemistry 2006; 99(3):431-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.055
  22. Choi Y, Noh D, Cho S, Suh H, Kim K, Kim J. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of propolis from several regions of Korea. Lebenson Wiss Technol 2006;39(7):756-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.05.015
  23. Haš&cčík P, Garlík J, Elimam IOE, Kačániová M, Pochop J, Bobko M, et al. Sensory quality of poultry meat after propolis application. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2011; 2:172-186.
  24. Suárez Mahecha H, Pardo Carrasco SC, Cortés Rodríguez M. Calidad físico-química y atributos sensoriales de filetes sajados biopreservados de cachama, empacados al vacío bajo refrigeración. Rev Colom Cienc Pecu 2009: 21(3):330-339.

Sistema OJS 3.4.0.3 - Metabiblioteca |